Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GOLHA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 6, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6 No violation of Art. 13 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 01.09.2009 - 7051/06
• EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06
• EGMR - 7051/06

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 06.05.1981 - 7759/77

  Buchholz ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  The Court has frequently reiterated that while applicants are entitled to make use of their procedural rights, they must bear the consequences when this leads to delays (see, mutatis mutandis, the Buchholz v. Germany judgment of 6 May 1981, Series A no. 42, pp. 21-22, § 63).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

  BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  I accept the importance of administering justice in a manner that does not jeopardise its effectiveness and credibility (see Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02

  SLAVICEK contre la CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  In this context the Court observes that several States have chosen to limit compensatory proceedings to one or two judicial instances (see Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII; Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos.

 
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00

  ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, § 14, ECHR 2005-V; and Scordino, cited above, § 62).
• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 50389/99

  DORAN v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  The Court reiterates that in addition to the actual award particular attention should be paid to the speediness of the remedial action itself, as the adequate nature of the remedy can be undermined by its excessive duration (see, inter alia, Doran v. Ireland, no. 50389/99, § 57, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); Sürmeli, cited above, § 101; and Martins Castro and Alves Correia de Castro v. Portugal, no. 33729/06, § 53, 10 June 2008).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, § 14, ECHR 2005-V; and Scordino, cited above, § 62).
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 36655/02

  SMIRNOVA v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  Also, the courts cannot attribute to the applicant the delays associated with the defendant's obstructions, as the attitude of other parties does not dispense them from ensuring a speedy trial (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 129, ECHR 2006-VII, and Smirnova v. Ukraine, no. 36655/02, § 69, 8 November 2005).
• EGMR, 21.02.2006 - 22771/04

  CAMBAL c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  In this context the Court points out that the expert witnesses, despite their inherent independence, fell within the control of the domestic courts, which bore responsibility for ensuring the smooth administration of justice (see Cambal v. the Czech Republic, no. 22771/04, § 33, 21 February 2006).
• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

  Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  Also, the courts cannot attribute to the applicant the delays associated with the defendant's obstructions, as the attitude of other parties does not dispense them from ensuring a speedy trial (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 129, ECHR 2006-VII, and Smirnova v. Ukraine, no. 36655/02, § 69, 8 November 2005).
• EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 22644/03

  SIMALDONE c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06

  Besides, compensatory proceedings in Italy, lasting eleven months at one level of jurisdiction, were found to be excessively long (see Simaldone v. Italy, no. 22644/03, § 29, ECHR 2009-... (extracts)).

• EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 25442/12

  KOHOUTEK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against the Czech Republic, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Golha v. the Czech Republic, no. 7051/06, 26 May 2011).
• EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 690/12

  URBAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against the Czech Republic, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Golha v. the Czech Republic, no. 7051/06, 26 May 2011).