Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AFTANACHE v. ROMANIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  M.A. v. ROMANIA

  Art. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 04.04.2018 - 43134/05

  G.N. ET AUTRES CONTRE L'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 999/19

  The Court reiterates that the allegations of persons suffering from serious illnesses fall under Article 2 of the Convention when the circumstances potentially engage the responsibility of the State (see, for instance, L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, §§ 36-41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, concerning an applicant suffering from leukaemia; G.N. and Others v. Italy, no. 43134/05, §§ 69-70, 1 December 2009, concerning applicants suffering from a potentially life-threatening disease, hepatitis; and Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039/11 and 358/12, §§ 8 and 106-08, ECHR 2012 (extracts), concerning applicants suffering from different forms of terminal cancer).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 999/19

  The Court, being master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 114 and 126, ECHR 2018), considers that this complaint should be examined from the standpoint of Article 2 of the Convention alone, which reads, in so far as relevant:.
• EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

  DE TOMMASO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 999/19

  The difference between deprivation and restriction of liberty is one of degree or intensity, and not one of nature or substance (see Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287/15, §§ 211-212, 21 November 2019, De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 80, ECHR 2017 (extracts), with further references, and Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483/12, § 64, ECHR 2016 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 41872/10

  M.A. c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 999/19

  The Court reiterates its established case-law to the effect that Article 5 § 1 may also apply to deprivations of liberty of a very short length (see, among many authorities, M.A. v. Cyprus, no. 41872/10, § 190, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 13472/18

  COSOVAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  The Court notes that Article 2 of the Convention may come into play even though the person whose right to life was allegedly breached did not die (Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase, cited above, §§ 134-145, and Aftanache v. Romania, no. 999/19, § 48, 26 May 2020).
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 13706/08

  AKSENOV v. RUSSIA

  Since in the applicant's case the criminal investigation was made available to the applicant under domestic law (see the domestic court's decisions of 10 July 2007 and 30 October 2008, paragraphs 17 and 19 above), it had to satisfy the requirement of effectiveness (compare Aftanache v. Romania, no. 999/19, §§ 67 and 69, 26 May 2020).
• EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 43/19

  MAYRAPETYAN v. ARMENIA

  There are no elements in the file to indicate that the authorities, being in possession of any specific information about the applicant's medical condition, had put his life in danger (compare and contrast Aftanache v. Romania, no. 999/19, §§ 52 and 53, 26 May 2020).
• EGMR - 50181/22 (anhängig)

  C.P. v. SPAIN

  Was the applicant deprived of her liberty in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention? If so, was the applicant's deprivation of liberty ordered "in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law" (see Aftanache v. Romania, no. 999/19, 26 May 2020)? Did the deprivation of liberty fall within any of the sub-paragraphs (a) to (f) of this provision?.
• EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 49973/10

  BOCHKAREVA v. RUSSIA

  (see ibid., § 216, with further references, and Aftanache v. Romania, no. 999/19, § 61, 26 May 2020).