Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.06.2003 - 57652/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,48242) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WURM v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2003 - 57652/00
Although Article 6 does not require accused persons actively to co-operate with the judicial authorities (see Eckle v. Germany judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 36, § 82, and as a more recent authority Ledonne v. Italy (no. 1) no. 35742/97, 12 May 1999, § 21), the fact that an applicant who wishes to complain before the Court about the length of proceedings is required to exhaust domestic remedies cannot in itself be contrary to Article 6 of the Convention.
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 8154/04
DUBOC v. AUSTRIA
The Court reiterates that it is its settled case-law that an applicant who complains of the length of proceedings before the ordinary courts being unreasonably long is normally required to file an application under section 91 of the Courts Act (see (see, Holzinger v. Austria (no. 1), no. 23459/94, §§ 21-23, ECHR 2001-I; and, with respect to criminal proceedings, Talirz v. Austria (dec.), no. 37323/97, 11 September 2001; Wurm v. Austria (dec.), no. 57652/00, 26 June 2003, Ecker v. Austria (dec.), no. 32042/02, 1 February 2005; Tuma v. Austria (dec.), no. 32942/03, 24 May 2007 and Saccoccia v. Austria (dec.), no. 69917/01, 5 July 2007).