Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 25321/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,64908) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ÜLGER v. TURKEY
Art. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 17, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Preliminary objections dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies six month period) Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 25321/02
- EGMR, 02.05.2018 - 25321/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 26083/94
WAITE AND KENNEDY v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 25321/02
Furthermore, a limitation will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is no reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 59, ECHR 1999-I, and Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, § 57, ECHR 2006-...). - EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 28249/95
KREUZ c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 25321/02
In so far as enforcement proceedings constitute an integral part of the trial, the Court considers that the right to a court, along with access to first instance and appeal courts for the determination of "civil rights and obligations" (see Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, §§ 53 and 54, ECHR 2001-VI), equally protects the right of access to enforcement proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, Manoilescu and Dobrescu v. Romania (dec.), no. 60861/00, ECHR 2005-....). - EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 60861/00
MANOILESCU AND DOBRESCU v. ROMANIA AND RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 25321/02
In so far as enforcement proceedings constitute an integral part of the trial, the Court considers that the right to a court, along with access to first instance and appeal courts for the determination of "civil rights and obligations" (see Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, §§ 53 and 54, ECHR 2001-VI), equally protects the right of access to enforcement proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, Manoilescu and Dobrescu v. Romania (dec.), no. 60861/00, ECHR 2005-....). - EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87
RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 25321/02
The Court reiterates that a "claim" may constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established so as to be enforceable (see Burdov v. Russia, cited above, § 40, and Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, p. 84, § 59).