Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CIESIELCZYK v. POLAND

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints, and that it offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V, and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  Such are the demands of that pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness without which there is no "democratic society" (see, among many other authorities, Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), judgment of 23 May 1991, Series A no. 204, § 57, and Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  The Court reiterates that the object of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to allow the national authorities (primarily the judicial authorities) to address an allegation of a violation of a Convention right and, where appropriate, to afford redress before that allegation is submitted to the Court (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).

 
• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 28525/95

  UNABHÄNGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  Where a statement amounts to a value judgment the proportionality of an interference may depend on whether there exists a sufficient factual basis for that statement, since even a value judgment may be excessive if it has no factual basis to support it (see, for example, Unabhängige Initiative Informationsvielfalt v. Austria, no. 28525/95, §§ 39-40, ECHR 2002-I; and Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 76, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints, and that it offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V, and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96

  CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  Lastly, the Court must satisfy itself that the penalty to which the applicant was subjected did not upset the balance between his freedom of expression and the need to protect Mr G.J."s reputation (see CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 111, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 62414/00

  PALUSINSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  In this connection the Court points to the established jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, which provided that constitutional complaints based solely on the allegedly wrongful interpretation of a legal provision were excluded from its jurisdiction (see Palusinski v. Poland (dec.), no. 62414/00, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 18235/02

  DABROWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  Although the Court has accepted on many occasions that a recourse to a degree of exaggeration, provocation, or immoderate statements (see Mamère v. France, no. 12697/03, § 25, ECHR 2006-..., and Dabrowski v. Poland, no. 18235/02, § 35, 19 December 2006), nevertheless, it must be left open to the domestic courts to punish gratuitous insult.
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  With regard to the second point, the Court has in numerous cases emphasised the essential role of the media in a democratic society, as also its duty to impart - in a manner consistent with its obligations and journalistic responsibilities - information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see, among the many authorities, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59, Series A no. 216; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88

  OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05

  With regard to the second point, the Court has in numerous cases emphasised the essential role of the media in a democratic society, as also its duty to impart - in a manner consistent with its obligations and journalistic responsibilities - information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see, among the many authorities, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59, Series A no. 216; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85

  Oberschlick ./. Österreich

• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10

  REMUSZKO v. POLAND

  Therefore the constitutional complaint cannot be regarded as an effective remedy in the applicant's case (see, among many other authorities, Palusinski v. Poland (dec.), no. 62414/00, ECHR 2006-...; Ciesielczyk v. Poland, no. 12484/05, § 28, 26 June 2012; and Sosinowska v. Poland, no. 10247/09, § 55, 18 October 2011).