Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 41824/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,14943) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MUSTAFA TASTAN v. TURKEY
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 41824/05
- EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 41824/05
- EGMR - 41824/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 41824/05
Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94
AVSAR c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 41824/05
In assessing evidence, the Court has generally applied the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)). - EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 45907/99
TANRIKOLU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 41824/05
The Court reiterates that allegations of ill-treatment must be supported by appropriate evidence (see, in particular, Tanrıkulu and Others v. Turkey (dec.), 45907/99, 22 October 2002). - EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 41824/05
In that respect, where an individual is taken into custody in good health but is found to be injured by the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused and to produce evidence casting doubt on the victim's allegations, particularly if those allegations were corroborated by medical reports, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, §§ 108-111, Series A no. 241-A; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336; Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, § 62, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 41824/05
In that respect, where an individual is taken into custody in good health but is found to be injured by the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused and to produce evidence casting doubt on the victim's allegations, particularly if those allegations were corroborated by medical reports, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, §§ 108-111, Series A no. 241-A; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336; Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, § 62, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V).