Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 50376/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,20733) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GÎRLEANU v. ROMANIA
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GÎRLEANU c. ROUMANIE
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11
MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 50376/09
The Court has consistently held that the press exercises a vital role of "public watchdog" in imparting information on matters of public concern (see, for example, Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary, no. 18030/11, § 167, 8 November 2016). - EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 48254/99
COBZARU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 50376/09
The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be reimbursed under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII, and Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 110, 26 July 2007). - EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93
NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 50376/09
The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be reimbursed under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII, and Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 110, 26 July 2007).
- EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 9142/16
SAGDIÇ c. TURQUIE
This aspect cannot therefore be decisive for the assessment of the case (compare Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551/01, § 55, 25 April 2006; Radio Twist a.s. v. Slovakia, no. 62202/00, § 60, ECHR 2006-XV; Gîrleanu v. Romania, no. 50376/09, § 91, 26 June 2018; and Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, §§ 141-144, ECHR 2007-V).