Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 8140/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,37090) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VITZTHUM v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 33354/96
Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Mitangeklagten als Zeugen im Sinne der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 8140/04
The Court's task is limited to ascertaining whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see, among many other authorities, Lucà v. Italy, no. 33354/96, § 38, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 8140/04
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
- EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 11568/08
JENIK v. AUSTRIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS
The Court lastly considers that the issue of excessive length of court proceedings has been dealt with by the Court in numerous cases - also against the respondent Government - in which the principles of the reasonable time requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention have been laid down, and that the Court has already specified the obligation which arises under the Convention for the respondent Government with regard to the lack of an effective remedy against excessively long court proceedings (see Stempfer v. Austria, no. 18294/03, § 48, 26 July 2007; Schutte v. Austria, no. 18015/03, § 38, 26 July 2007; Vitzthum v. Austria, no. 8140/04, § 31, 26 July 2007, and Hauser-Spor v. Austria, no. 37301/03, § 40, 7 December 2006).