Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HADZHINIKOLOV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13+6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13+6-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Hadzhinikolov v. Bulgaria

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 24720/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 24720/04

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 24720/04

  A remedy is effective if it prevents the alleged violation or its continuation or provides adequate redress for any breach that has already occurred (ibid., § 158, and Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 17, ECHR 2002-VIII).

 
• EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 48129/99

  TREIAL v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 24720/04

  The Court reiterates that a successful litigant may be required to undertake certain procedural steps and to act with a certain diligence in order to recover a judgment debt (see Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 69, ECHR 2009-...; Treial v. Estonia (dec.), no. 48129/99, 28 November 2000; and Topciov v. Romania (dec.), no. 17369/02, 15 June 2006).
• EGMR, 07.06.2005 - 71186/01

  FUKLEV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 24720/04

  It further notes that State responsibility for enforcement of a judgment against a private party extends no further than the involvement of State bodies in the enforcement procedures (see Fuklev v. Ukraine, no. 71186/01, § 67, 7 June 2005).
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 17369/02

  TOPCIOV c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 24720/04

  The Court reiterates that a successful litigant may be required to undertake certain procedural steps and to act with a certain diligence in order to recover a judgment debt (see Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 69, ECHR 2009-...; Treial v. Estonia (dec.), no. 48129/99, 28 November 2000; and Topciov v. Romania (dec.), no. 17369/02, 15 June 2006).
• EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 10911/05

  PANCHENKO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 24720/04

  Therefore, the enforcement of a final judgment should not be dissociated from the judicial proceedings and the proceedings are to be examined in their entirety (see, among many others, Estima Jorge v. Portugal, 21 April 1998, § 35, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II; Sika v. Slovakia, no. 2132/02, §§ 24-27, 13 June 2006; and Ivan Panchenko v. Ukraine, no. 10911/05, § 55, 10 December 2009).

• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 32503/05

  KOSTOV v. BULGARIA

  Thus they are required not only to request the opening of the enforcement proceedings, but also to periodically request specific enforcement actions to be carried out (see Hadzhinikolov v. Bulgaria [Committee], no. 24720/04, § 30, 26 July 2011).