Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 10 (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• yahoo.com (Pressemeldung, 26.07.2011)

  Europagericht verteidigt Berichte über urinierenden Abgeordneten

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Ringier Axel Springer Slovakia, a.s. v. Slovakia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05
• EGMR, 29.05.2013 - 41262/05

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95

  FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05

  While the existence of facts can be demonstrated, the truth of value judgments is not susceptible of proof (see, for instance, Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, §§ 75-76, ECHR 2001-VIII; Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II; De Haes and Gijsels, cited above, § 47; and Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 2), 1 July 1997, § 33, Reports 1997-IV).

  The Court's task in exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the national authorities but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I and Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 73, ECHR 2001-VIII).

• EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96

  CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05

  In doing so, the Court has to satisfy itself that the national authorities, basing themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts, applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10. The Court must also ascertain whether the domestic authorities struck a fair balance between the protection of freedom of expression as enshrined in Article 10 and the protection of the reputation of those against whom allegations have been made, a right which, as an aspect of private life, is protected by Article 8 of the Convention (for a recapitulation of the relevant principles, see CumpÇ?nÇ? and MazÇ?re v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 89 - 91, ECHR 2004-XI and also Marônek, cited above, § 53).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05

  Lastly, the Government submitted that the present case was to be distinguished from that of Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway ([GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999-III) in that A. itself was the author of the contested articles and in that the articles did not concern a current issue of public debate but were aimed at stirring up a scandal.

 
• EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 26958/95

  JERUSALEM c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05

  While the existence of facts can be demonstrated, the truth of value judgments is not susceptible of proof (see, for instance, Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, §§ 75-76, ECHR 2001-VIII; Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II; De Haes and Gijsels, cited above, § 47; and Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 2), 1 July 1997, § 33, Reports 1997-IV).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 32686/96

  MARONEK v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05

  The applicant company considered the amount of the damages awarded to be excessive, referring to the judgment of the Court in the case of Marônek v. Slovakia (no. 32686/96, ECHR 2001-III), where the equivalent of some 5, 850 European Currency Units worth of damages in a libel case had been considered excessive.
• EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 62202/00

  RADIO TWIST A.S. v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05

  This power of appreciation is not, however, unlimited but goes hand in hand with a European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see, for example, Bezymyannyy v. Russia, no. 10941/03, § 36, 8 April 2010 and Radio Twist, A.S. v. Slovakia, no. 62202/00, § 49, ECHR 2006-XV).
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 10941/03

  BEZYMYANNYY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05

  This power of appreciation is not, however, unlimited but goes hand in hand with a European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see, for example, Bezymyannyy v. Russia, no. 10941/03, § 36, 8 April 2010 and Radio Twist, A.S. v. Slovakia, no. 62202/00, § 49, ECHR 2006-XV).
• EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88

  OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05

  Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of "public watchdog" (see, for instance, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59, Series A no. 216).

• EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 3690/10

  Meinungsfreiheit: Erfolg für Abtreibungsgegner

  Er stellt ferner fest, dass eine Prüfung der Rechtssache daher eine individuelle und kontextbezogene Beurteilung erfordern würde, die sich auf die Situation zu dem Zeitpunkt bezieht, zu dem die angegriffene Veröffentlichung online gestellt wurde (vgl. Ringier Axel Springer Slovakia, a. s../. Slowakei, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 41262/05, Rdnr. 106, 26. Juli 2011; Ringier Axel Springer Slovakia, a.s../. Slowakei (Nr. 3), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 37986/09, Rdnrn. 83, 84, 7. Januar 2014).