Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 52793/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2003,54251
EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 52793/99 (https://dejure.org/2003,54251)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.08.2003 - 52793/99 (https://dejure.org/2003,54251)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. August 2003 - 52793/99 (https://dejure.org/2003,54251)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,54251) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85

    H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 52793/99
    A waiver can be done explicitly or tacitly, in the latter case for example by refraining from submitting or maintaining a request for a hearing (see, among other authorities, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 20, §§ 64 and 66; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, pp. 19-20, § 58).
  • EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90

    FISCHER c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 52793/99
    10-11, §§ 21-22; and Fischer v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, pp.
  • EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

    SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 52793/99
    A waiver can be done explicitly or tacitly, in the latter case for example by refraining from submitting or maintaining a request for a hearing (see, among other authorities, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 20, §§ 64 and 66; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, pp. 19-20, § 58).
  • EGMR, 23.02.1994 - 18928/91

    FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 52793/99
    Furthermore, a hearing may not be necessary due to exceptional circumstances of the case, for example when it raises no questions of fact or law which cannot be adequately resolved on the basis of the case-file and the parties" written observations (see inter alia Salomonsson v. Sweden, no. 38978/97, § 34, 12 November 2002, unreported; Lundevall v. Sweden, no. 38629/97, § 34, 12 November 2002, unreported; Döry v. Sweden, no. 28394/95, § 37, unreported; and mutatis mutandis, Fredin v. Sweden (no. 2), judgment of 23 February 1994, Series A no. 283-A, pp.
  • EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

    DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 52793/99
    With regard to the complaint that the applicant was denied an examination of a witness on his behalf the Courts reiterates that the right to a fair hearing entails, in both civil and criminal proceedings, that everyone who is a party to such proceedings shall have reasonable opportunity of presenting their case to the court under conditions which do not place him or her at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his or her opponent, the essential aim being an equality of arms in the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, § 33; Ankerl v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, pp. 1567-68, § 38 and the Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland judgment of 18 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, p. 107, § 23).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht