Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 68890/01   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2006,48138
EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 68890/01 (https://dejure.org/2006,48138)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.09.2006 - 68890/01 (https://dejure.org/2006,48138)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. September 2006 - 68890/01 (https://dejure.org/2006,48138)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,48138) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BLAKE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 68890/01
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 38805/97

    K. c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 68890/01
    While it is conceivable that in certain circumstances the period might begin earlier (Golder v. United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, § 32), this is exceptional and has been accepted where, for example, certain preliminary steps were a necessary preamble to the proceedings (K. v. Italy, no. 38805/97, § 35, ECHR 2004-VIII).
  • EGMR, 18.10.1982 - 6878/75

    LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN AND DE MEYERE v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 68890/01
    The Court does not find that any domestic costs or expenses to which the applicant referred were incurred in order to try to prevent the violation established by the Court or to obtain redress therefore (Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium (Article 50), judgment of 18 October 1982, Series A no. 54, § 17).
  • EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

    GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 68890/01
    While it is conceivable that in certain circumstances the period might begin earlier (Golder v. United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, § 32), this is exceptional and has been accepted where, for example, certain preliminary steps were a necessary preamble to the proceedings (K. v. Italy, no. 38805/97, § 35, ECHR 2004-VIII).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 68890/01
    The applicant had, they considered, brought the proceedings on himself as a self-confessed traitor who wished to profit from his treachery (McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, § 219), there was no indication of any emotional stress or anxiety caused by the delay and no evidence that the money was of any real consequence to the applicant as he lived in, and was supported by, the Russian State.
  • EGMR, 10.07.1984 - 8990/80

    GUINCHO c. PORTUGAL

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 68890/01
    The State remains responsible for the efficiency of its system (Guincho v. Portugal, judgment of 10 July 1984, Series A no. 81, § 38) and the manner in which it provides for mechanisms to comply with the reasonable time requirement - whether by automatic time-limits and directions or some other method - is for it to decide.
  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 32541/08

    Keine Käfige für Angeklagte

    Tout État qui laisse une procédure se poursuivre au-delà du « délai raisonnable'prescrit par l'article 6 de la Convention sans rien tenter pour la faire progresser est responsable du retard qui en résulte (Blake c. Royaume-Uni, no 68890/01, § 45, 26 septembre 2006).
  • EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 31634/18

    RIMSEVICS v. LATVIA

    In the absence of a "criminal charge", where no such criminal proceedings are, or have been in existence, Article 6 § 2 has been found not to be applicable (see Larrañaga Arando and Others, cited above, § 40; Zollman v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902/00, ECHR 2003-XII; and Blake v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 68890/01, §§ 123-24, 25 October 2005).
  • EGMR, 08.10.2013 - 29864/03

    MULOSMANI v. ALBANIA

    Toutefois, une renonciation ne doit pas aller à l'encontre d'un intérêt général important, doit se trouver établie de manière non équivoque et doit s'entourer d'un minimum de garanties correspondant à sa gravité (Blake c. Royaume-Uni, no 68890/01, § 127, 26 septembre 2006).
  • EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 73911/16

    LARRAÑAGA ARANDO AND OTHERS v. SPAIN

    In the absence of a "criminal charge", where no such criminal proceedings are, or have been in existence, Article 6 § 2 has been found not to be applicable (see Zollman v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902/00, ECHR 2003-XII; Blake v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 68890/01, §§ 123-24, 25 October 2005; Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862/05, 12 May 2015; and Sharxhi and Others v. Albania, no. 10613/16, § 178, 11 January 2018).
  • EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16

    MARTÍNEZ AGIRRE AND OTHERS v. SPAIN

    In the absence of a "criminal charge", where no such criminal proceedings are, or have been in existence, Article 6 § 2 has been found not to be applicable (see Zollman v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902/00, ECHR 2003-XII; Blake v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 68890/01, §§ 123-24, 25 October 2005; Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862/05, 12 May 2015; and Sharxhi and Others v. Albania, no. 10613/16, § 178, 11 January 2018).
  • EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 75757/14

    BOGNÁR v. HUNGARY

    It notes, however, that since the applicant's application to the administrative authority was a necessary preliminary step to the proceedings (see Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 65, ECHR 2007-II, and Blake v. the United Kingdom, no. 68890/01, § 40, 26 September 2006 ) the period began to run on 14 January 2004 (see paragraph 9 above).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht