Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 3230/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,62573) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
COSTA v. PORTUGAL
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 14102/02
BEKAURI v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 3230/14
Similarly, an application may be rejected as constituting an abuse of the right of application if applicants - despite their obligation under Article 47 § 7 of the Rules of Court - fail to inform the Court of important new developments regarding their pending applications, given that such conduct prevents the Court from ruling on the matter in full knowledge of the facts (see Bekauri v. Georgia, (dec.) no. 14102/02, §§ 21-23, 10 April 2012). - EGMR, 19.06.2006 - 23130/04
Menschenrechtskonvention : Unzulässigkeit der Beschwerde wegen Missbrauchs des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 3230/14
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Jian v. Romania, (dec.), no. 46640/99, 30 March 2004, and Kerechashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, ECHR 2006-V (extracts)) or if incomplete and therefore misleading information was submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, and Basileo v. Italy (dec.), no. 11303/02, 23 August 2011). - EGMR, 23.08.2011 - 11303/02
BASILEO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 3230/14
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Jian v. Romania, (dec.), no. 46640/99, 30 March 2004, and Kerechashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, ECHR 2006-V (extracts)) or if incomplete and therefore misleading information was submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, and Basileo v. Italy (dec.), no. 11303/02, 23 August 2011). - EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 5667/02
KÉRÉTCHACHVILI c. GEORGIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 3230/14
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Jian v. Romania, (dec.), no. 46640/99, 30 March 2004, and Kerechashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, ECHR 2006-V (extracts)) or if incomplete and therefore misleading information was submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, and Basileo v. Italy (dec.), no. 11303/02, 23 August 2011).