Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 37412/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,62554) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GVOZDIC v. SLOVENIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 33958/96
WETTSTEIN v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 37412/09
What is decisive is whether this fear can be held to be objectively justified (see Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 44, ECHR 2000-XII, and Micallef, cited above, 96). - EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98
KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 37412/09
As to the complaints regarding the alleged bias of one of the judges of the higher court, the Court has repeatedly held that the existence of impartiality for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to (i) a subjective test, where regard must be had to the personal conviction and behaviour of a particular judge - that is to say whether the judge held any personal prejudice or bias in a given case; and (ii) an objective test, that is to say by ascertaining whether the tribunal itself and, among other aspects, its composition, offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in respect of its impartiality (see, inter alia, Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 191, ECHR 2003-VI, and Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11, § 104, ECHR 2013).