Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.09.2019 - 56317/11, 67932/11, 27472/12, 59661/12, 6814/13, 6903/13, 7990/13, 12717/13, 28563/13, 23365/14, 25680/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 26.09.2019 - 56317/11, 67932/11, 27472/12, 59661/12, 6814/13, 6903/13, 7990/13, 12717/13, 28563/13, 23365/14, 25680/14 (https://dejure.org/2019,31012)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.09.2019 - 56317/11, 67932/11, 27472/12, 59661/12, 6814/13, 6903/13, 7990/13, 12717/13, 28563/13, 23365/14, 25680/14 (https://dejure.org/2019,31012)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. September 2019 - 56317/11, 67932/11, 27472/12, 59661/12, 6814/13, 6903/13, 7990/13, 12717/13, 28563/13, 23365/14, 25680/14 (https://dejure.org/2019,31012)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,31012) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MAJIDLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 17526/10
GÜLCÜ v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2019 - 56317/11
The Court reiterates that when individuals are involved in acts of violence the State authorities enjoy a wider margin of appreciation when examining the need for an interference with freedom of assembly, and the imposition of a sanction for such reprehensible acts would be considered to be compatible with the guarantees of Article 11 of the Convention (see Gülcü v. Turkey, no. 17526/10, § 116, 19 January 2016). - EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 57316/10
IMRET v. TURKEY (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2019 - 56317/11
Having regard to the facts of the cases and its finding of a violation of Article 11 of the Convention, the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility or the merits of the respective applicants" complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Imret v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 57316/10, § 61, 10 July 2018). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2019 - 56317/11
Having regard to the facts of the cases and its finding of a violation of Article 11 of the Convention, the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility or the merits of the respective applicants" complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Imret v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 57316/10, § 61, 10 July 2018).