Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 25951/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63528) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOMAR v. SLOVAKIA
Wird zitiert von ... (10) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 25951/06
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 23865/03
BIC v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 25951/06
In view of the above, it concludes that the applicant did not lose his status as a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention (see, for example, Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, § 37, 4 November 2008).
- EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 5317/14
SNOPKO v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 20050/15
PAVLIS v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 34906/14
LUKÁC v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010).
- EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 49377/14
LUKÁCOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 42326/14
ALLIANZ - SLOVENSKÁ POISTOVNA, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 6590/13
DUBOVSKÁ v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 76324/14
HOLANOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 4716/15
TUDOR v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 68715/11
BITTO v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008, or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 69343/11
DURDOVIC AND TRANCÍKOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010).