Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OGLOBLINA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95

  ATHANASSOGLOU ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 28852/05

  Indeed, the applicant failed to show that the deforestation exposed her personally to a danger that was not only serious but also specific and, above all, imminent (see Balmer-Schafroth and Others v. Switzerland, 26 August 1997, § 40, Reports 1997-IV; Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 51, ECHR 2000-IV; and Ivan Atanasov v. Bulgaria, no. 12853/03, § 92, 2 December 2010).
• EGMR, 22.05.2003 - 41666/98

  KYRTATOS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 28852/05

  Thus, in order to raise an issue under Article 8 the interference must directly affect the applicant's home, family or private life (see Kyrtatos v. Greece, no. 41666/98, § 52, ECHR 2003-VI; Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 68, ECHR 2005-IV; and Aydin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 40806/07, § 24, 15 May 2012).
• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 28852/05

  Thus, in order to raise an issue under Article 8 the interference must directly affect the applicant's home, family or private life (see Kyrtatos v. Greece, no. 41666/98, § 52, ECHR 2003-VI; Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 68, ECHR 2005-IV; and Aydin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 40806/07, § 24, 15 May 2012).

 
• EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 38197/03

  MARCHIS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 28852/05

  The Court further points out that the adverse effects of environmental pollution must attain a certain minimum level if they are to fall within the scope of Article 8 (see López Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 51, Series A no. 303-C; Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 118, ECHR 2003-VIII; and Marchis and Others v. Romania (dec.), no. 38197/03, § 33, 28 June 2011).
• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 40806/07

  AYDIN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 28852/05

  Thus, in order to raise an issue under Article 8 the interference must directly affect the applicant's home, family or private life (see Kyrtatos v. Greece, no. 41666/98, § 52, ECHR 2003-VI; Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 68, ECHR 2005-IV; and Aydin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 40806/07, § 24, 15 May 2012).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90

  LÓPEZ OSTRA c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 28852/05

  The Court further points out that the adverse effects of environmental pollution must attain a certain minimum level if they are to fall within the scope of Article 8 (see López Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 51, Series A no. 303-C; Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 118, ECHR 2003-VIII; and Marchis and Others v. Romania (dec.), no. 38197/03, § 33, 28 June 2011).
• EGMR, 23.10.1985 - 8848/80

  BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 28852/05

  Moreover the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question (see, for example, Benthem v. the Netherlands, 23 October 1985, § 32, Series A no. 97; Rolf Gustafson v. Sweden, 1 July 1997, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV; and Skärby v. Sweden, 28 June 1990, § 27, Series A no. 180-B).