Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VARTIC v. ROMANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 14+8, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 61603/00

  Konventionskonforme Auslegung des deutschen (Zivil-)Rechts …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37952/09

  The Court reiterates that an interference with the physical integrity of an individual can be regarded as an interference with the right to respect for private life (see Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-II, and Storck v. Germany, no. 61603/00, § 143, ECHR 2005-V).
• EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 19234/04

  BACILA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37952/09

  Breaches of the right to respect for private life also include those that are not concrete or physical, such as noise, emissions, smells or other forms of interference (see, amongst many other authorities, Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 96, ECHR 2003-VIII, and Bacila v. Romania, no. 19234/04, § 59, 30 March 2010).
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  LEANDER c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37952/09

  The scope of the margin of appreciation will depend not only on the nature of the legitimate aim pursued but also on the particular nature of the interference involved (see, mutatis mutandis, Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 59, Series A no. 116).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90

  LÓPEZ OSTRA c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37952/09

  Being master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I), and in the light of its case-law (see, amongst many other authorities, López Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 51, Series A no. 303-C, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, §§ 64-67, 7 April 2009), the Court considers that the applicants" complaints fall to be examined under Article 8 of the Convention taken alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention, which provide:.

• EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 53168/12

  GHIROGA c. ROUMANIE

  Les tribunaux saisis d'une telle affaire auraient pu examiner sur le fond le grief de l'intéressé tiré du manquement à son droit au respect de sa vie privée en raison de la surveillance dont il a fait l'objet en jugeant si les conditions de la responsabilité civile étaient réunies en l'espèce et lui allouer une somme au titre de l'éventuel préjudice (voir, mutatis mutandis, Vartic c. Roumanie (déc.), no 37952/09, § 27, 26 novembre 2013).