Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 24213/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,35160) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BASENKO v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BASENKO v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR - 19993/04
[ENG]
- EGMR - 14163/04
[ENG]
- EGMR - 10200/04
[ENG]
- EGMR - 21819/04
[ENG]
- EGMR - 13466/03
[ENG]
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 24213/08
Whilst the degree of public scrutiny required may vary, the complainant must be afforded effective access to the investigative procedure in all cases (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 137, ECHR 2004-IV, and Oleksiy Mykhaylovych Zakharkin v. Ukraine, no. 1727/04, § 67, 24 June 2010). - EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 24213/08
Whilst the degree of public scrutiny required may vary, the complainant must be afforded effective access to the investigative procedure in all cases (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 137, ECHR 2004-IV, and Oleksiy Mykhaylovych Zakharkin v. Ukraine, no. 1727/04, § 67, 24 June 2010). - EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
KRASTANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 24213/08
A Contracting State will be responsible under the Convention for violations of human rights caused by acts of its agents carried out in the performance of their duties (see, for example, Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004). - EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 1727/04
OLEKSIY MYKHAYLOVYCH ZAKHARKIN v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 24213/08
Whilst the degree of public scrutiny required may vary, the complainant must be afforded effective access to the investigative procedure in all cases (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 137, ECHR 2004-IV, and Oleksiy Mykhaylovych Zakharkin v. Ukraine, no. 1727/04, § 67, 24 June 2010). - EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02
- EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 64320/01
- EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 29750/09
HASSAN c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99
Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere
- EGMR - 8297/10 (anhängig)
KOLIYCHUK v. UKRAINE
Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his Convention complaints, as required by Article 13 of the Convention? In particular, was he able to obtain compensation for the damages caused by the ill-treatment complained of (see, mutatis mutandis, Basenko v. Ukraine, no. 24213/08, §§ 103-106, 26 November 2015)?. - EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 47889/08
VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
In order to establish whether a State can be held responsible for the unlawful actions of its agents taken outside their official duties, the Court needs to assess the totality of the circumstances and consider the nature and circumstances of the conduct in question (see, for example, Basenko v. Ukraine, no. 24213/08, § 78, 26 November 2015).