Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHANIN v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 24460/04

  However, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 24460/04

  However, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99

  KRASTANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 24460/04

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch, cited above, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

 
• EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 65859/01

  SHEYDAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 24460/04

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch, cited above, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).
• EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 4353/03

  TARARIEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 24460/04

  The Court has emphasised that persons in custody are in a vulnerable position and that the authorities are under a duty to protect their physical well-being (see Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 73, ECHR 2006-... (extracts).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 24460/04

  Where domestic proceedings have taken place, as in the present case, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 29, Series A no. 269).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 24460/04

  Indeed, as rightly pointed out by the national court in the present case (see paragraph 36 above), the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a plausible explanation for the injuries (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336).

• EGMR, 15.10.2019 - 52673/07

  GRIGORYEV c. RUSSIE

  Un retard mis par un requérant à porter plainte n'est pas décisif dès lors que les autorités auraient dû être averties qu'une personne pouvait avoir subi des mauvais traitements, le devoir d'enquête mis à la charge des autorités leur incombant même en l'absence de plainte formelle (voir Shanin c. Russie, no 24460/04, § 65, 27 janvier 2011, et Velev c. Bulgarie, no 43531/08, §§ 59-60, 16 avril 2013).
• EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 13810/04

  SHAMARDAKOV v. RUSSIA

  Elle considère que le retard dans le début des investigations est essentiellement dû à l'inertie des autorités face à la situation décrite ci-dessus et leur est donc imputable (voir A.A. c. Russie, no 49097/08, § 88, 17 janvier 2012 ; Shanin c. Russie, no 24460/04, § 68, 27 janvier 2011, et Davitidze c. Russie, no 8810/05, § 108, 30 mai 2013).
• EGMR - 45914/06

  SHARIPOV v. RUSSIA

  (c) Did the absence of instituted criminal proceedings prevent investigative measures, which could correspond to the notion of an effective investigation, as required by the Court's case-law under Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Taraburca v. Moldova, no. 18919/10, § 57, 6 December 2011, and Shanin v. Russia, no. 24460/04, § 69, 27 January 2011)? Which of the investigation methods employed for a preliminary investigation under Articles 150-226 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCrP) could be and were employed, in the present case, in the course of the inquiry under Article 144 of the Code?.
• EGMR - 60527/10 (anhängig)

  SHIRALIYEV v. RUSSIA

  (c) Did the absence of instituted criminal proceedings prevent investigative measures, which could correspond to the notion of an effective investigation, as required by the Court's case-law under Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Taraburca v. Moldova, no. 18919/10, § 57, 6 December 2011, and Shanin v. Russia, no. 24460/04, § 69, 27 January 2011)? Which of the investigation methods employed for a preliminary investigation under Articles 150-226 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCrP) could be and were employed, in the present case, in the course of the inquiry under Article 144 of the Code?.