Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,447
EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,447)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.01.2015 - 37715/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,447)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. Januar 2015 - 37715/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,447)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,447) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 26.02.2013 - 24589/04

    BOZKIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11
    Moreover, the Court has already accepted that the more time that goes by without any news of the person who has disappeared, the greater the likelihood that he or she has died (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, § 226, ECHR 2004-III; see also Bozkır and Others v. Turkey, no. 24589/04, § 58, 26 February 2013).
  • EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01

    MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11
    However, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 107, 26 January 2006 and the cases cited therein).
  • EGMR, 24.04.2003 - 24351/94

    AKTAS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11
    Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of death or the person responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see Aktas v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 300, ECHR 2003-V (extracts) and the cases cited therein).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11
    To that end, the Court reiterates that the obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 161, Series A no. 324; Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 105, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I).
  • EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 12938/07

    CERF v. TURKEY

    In light of the foregoing, the Court considers that the information submitted to the authorities in January 2000 led to significant new developments and that therefore the procedural obligation to investigate the killing of the applicant's husband was revived after that date (see Gasyak and Others v. Turkey, no. 27872/03, §§ 60-63, 13 October 2009; see also Saygi v. Turkey, no. 37715/11, § 50, 27 January 2015).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht