Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2001,36036
EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94 (https://dejure.org/2001,36036)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.02.2001 - 25704/94 (https://dejure.org/2001,36036)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. Februar 2001 - 25704/94 (https://dejure.org/2001,36036)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,36036) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    CICEK v. TURKEY

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14+2, Art. 14, Art. 14+3, Art. 14+5, Art. 14+13, Art. 18, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 3 with regard to the applicant's sons Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 3 with regard to the applicant Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14+2 14+3 14+5 14+13 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 No violation of Art. ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (35)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

    ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94
    The Court recalls the earlier findings of the Commission and Court concerning the inadequacy and unreliability of custody records (see Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 105, ECHR 1999-IV; Aydın v. Turkey judgment of 25 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, Opinion of the Commission, p. 1941, § 172) that such records cannot in general be relied upon to prove that a person was not taken into custody.
  • EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22492/93

    KILIÇ v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94
    It is to be recalled that the Court has held in earlier judgments that defects undermining the effectiveness of criminal law protection in the south-east during the period relevant also to this case, permitted or fostered a lack of accountability of members of the security forces for their actions (see Cemil Kılıç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 75, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 98, both to be published in ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

    MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94
    It is to be recalled that the Court has held in earlier judgments that defects undermining the effectiveness of criminal law protection in the south-east during the period relevant also to this case, permitted or fostered a lack of accountability of members of the security forces for their actions (see Cemil Kılıç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 75, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 98, both to be published in ECHR 2000).
     
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94
    The Court reiterates that the obligation to protect life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention "to secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see, Timurtas v. Turkey, loc. cit., § 87, and mutatis mutandis, the McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 49, § 161 and the Kaya v. Turkey judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, § 105).
  • EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83

    BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94
    The Court recalls that there must be a causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention and that this may, in the appropriate case, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see amongst others, the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 13 June 1994 (Article 50), Series A no. 285-C, pp.
  • EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89

    CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94
    The Court reiterates that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3 (see, among other authorities, the Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 31, § 83).
  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

    IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    authorities to account for individuals under their control, Article 5 requires them to take effective measures to safeguard against the risk of disappearance and to conduct a prompt and effective investigation into an arguable claim that a person has been taken into custody and has not been seen since (see Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no.23657/94, § 104, ECHR-1999-IV; and Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, § 164, 27 February 2001).
  • EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 7524/06

    CÜLAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    La Cour constate que ni les autorités nationales compétentes ni le Gouvernement n'ont fourni d'explication sur ce qui s'est passé après l'arrestation non reconnue des proches des requérants (Timurtas, précité, § 86, et Çiçek c. Turquie, no 25704/94, § 147, 27 février 2001).
  • EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 13660/05

    TEKÇI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    La Cour constate que ni les autorités nationales compétentes ni le Gouvernement n'ont fourni d'explication sur ce qui s'est passé après l'arrestation non reconnue du proche des requérants (Timurtas précité, § 86, et Çiçek c. Turquie, no 25704/94, § 147, 27 février 2001).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht