Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,54507
EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,54507)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.02.2007 - 65559/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,54507)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. Februar 2007 - 65559/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,54507)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,54507) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    NESTAK v. SLOVAKIA

    Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 5-4 Violation of Art. 6-2 Violation of Art. 6-1 (impartial tribunal) Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 (procedural unfairness) Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses ...

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (34)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

  • EGMR, 25.02.1997 - 22107/93

    FINDLAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
    Having regard to its finding under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention as regards the lack of impartiality of the tribunal (see the preceding paragraph), the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine separately the applicant's complaint that his trial had been unfair in other aspects (see, mutatis mutandis, Findlay v. the United Kingdom, no. 22107/93, § 80, ECHR 1997-I and Indra v. Slovakia, no. 46845/99, § 58, 1 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
    The Court finds that the "reasonableness" of this suspicion raises no issue under Article 5 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 155, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 46845/99

    INDRA v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
    Having regard to its finding under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention as regards the lack of impartiality of the tribunal (see the preceding paragraph), the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine separately the applicant's complaint that his trial had been unfair in other aspects (see, mutatis mutandis, Findlay v. the United Kingdom, no. 22107/93, § 80, ECHR 1997-I and Indra v. Slovakia, no. 46845/99, § 58, 1 February 2005).
     
  • EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 67175/01

    REINPRECHT c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
    Although it is not always necessary that the procedure under Article 5 § 4 be attended by the same guarantees as those required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for criminal or civil litigation, it must have a judicial character and provide guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question (see, among many other authorities, Reinprecht v. Austria, no. 67175/01, § 31, ECHR 2005-...).
  • EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

    DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
    It suffices, in the absence of a formal finding, that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court or the official in question regards the accused as guilty, while a premature expression of such an opinion by the tribunal itself will inevitably run foul of the said presumption (see, among many other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 30, § 56 and 37; Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, p. 16, §§ 35-36).
  • EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

    Minelli ./. Schweiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
    Article 6 § 2 governs criminal proceedings in their entirety, "irrespective of the outcome of the prosecution" (see, among many other authorities, Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, §§ 27, 30).
  • EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

    ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
    It suffices, in the absence of a formal finding, that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court or the official in question regards the accused as guilty, while a premature expression of such an opinion by the tribunal itself will inevitably run foul of the said presumption (see, among many other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 30, § 56 and 37; Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, p. 16, §§ 35-36).
  • EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

    DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
    In this connection the Court would reiterate that even appearances may be of a certain importance or, in other words, "justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done" (see, mutatis mutandis, De Cubber v. Belgium, judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, p. 14, § 26).
  • EGMR, 21.10.1986 - 9862/82

    SANCHEZ-REISSE c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
    The proceedings must be adversarial and must always ensure "equality of arms" between the parties, the prosecutor and the detained person (see, among many other authorities, the Sanchez-Reisse v. Switzerland judgment of 21 October 1986, Series A no. 107, p. 19, § 51).
  • BGH, 14.10.2015 - 1 StR 56/15

    Fall Mollath: Revision des Angeklagten als unzulässig verworfen

    Dabei hat der Gerichtshof der konkreten Wortwahl der jeweils angegriffenen Entscheidung maßgebliche Bedeutung beigemessen und diese im Kontext mit der gegebenen Verfahrenslage gewürdigt (vgl. EGMR, Slg. 2000-X Nr. 39, 41 - Daktaras/Litauen; EGMR, NJW 2004, 43 Nr. 54, 56 - Böhmer/Deutschland; EGMR, Urteil vom 27. Februar 2007 - 65559/01 Nr. 88 f. - Neš?ák/Slowakei; EGMR, Urteil vom 23. Oktober 2008 - 13470/02 Nr. 94 - Khuzhin u.a./Russland; EGMR, Urteil vom 2. Juni 2009 - 24528/02 Nr. 45 ff. - Borovský/Slowakei).
  • EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 17103/10

    Verletzung des Grundsatzes der Unschuldsvermutung gegenüber einem türkischen …

    Der Gerichtshof hat in diesem Zusammenhang die Bedeutung betont, die der Wortwahl von Amtsträgern bei Äußerungen zukommt, die diese tätigen, bevor eine Person wegen einer bestimmten Straftat verurteilt worden ist (…siehe Daktaras , a. a. O., Rdnr. 41;… B. , a. a. O., Rdnrn. 54 und 56; Nesťák ./. Slowakei , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 65559/01, Rdnrn. 88 und 89, 27. Februar 2007;… Khuzhin u. a. ./. Russland , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 13470/02, Rdnr. 94, 23. Oktober 2008;… und Borovský , a. a. O., Rdnrn. 45 f.).
  • EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09

    ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Viewed as a procedural guarantee in the context of a criminal trial itself, the presumption of innocence imposes requirements in respect of, inter alia, the burden of proof (see Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, § 77, Series A no. 146; and Telfner v. Austria, no. 33501/96, § 15, 20 March 2001); legal presumptions of fact and law (see Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, § 28, Series A no. 141-A; and Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984/00, § 24, ECHR 2004-II); the privilege against self-incrimination (see Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; and Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, § 40, ECHR 2000-XII); pre-trial publicity (see Akay v. Turkey (dec.), no. 34501/97, 19 February 2002; and G.C.P. v. Romania, no. 20899/03, § 46, 20 December 2011); and premature expressions, by the trial court or by other public officials, of a defendant's guilt (see Allenet de Ribemont, cited above, §§ 35-36; and Nesták v. Slovakia, no. 65559/01, § 88, 27 February 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht