Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PETKEVICIUTE v. LITHUANIA

  No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  PETKEVICIUTÄ- v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 28.03.2013 - 14087/08

  NOVAYA GAZETA AND BORODYANSKIY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 57676/11

  In this connection, the Court notes that Article 10 of the Convention includes not only the freedom to hold opinions but also the freedom to impart information and ideas, and it has been applied numerous times in cases concerning interference with the rights of publishers who were not themselves the authors of the impugned publications (see, among many other authorities, Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 75, 7 February 2012; Novaya Gazeta and Borodyanskiy v. Russia, no. 14087/08, § 31, 28 March 2013; and Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931/13, §§ 139-40, ECHR 2017 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 18748/10

  KIESER AND TRALAU-KLEINERT v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 57676/11

  The applicant argued that those statements should be classified as value judgments because they had been based on her father's memories and he had admitted that his knowledge had been limited (see paragraph 56 above), but the Court is unable to share this view - the statements were not limited to expressing opinions or subjective views and were susceptible of proof (see, mutatis mutandis, Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 76, ECHR 2004-XI, and Kieser and Tralau-Kleinert v. Germany (dec.), no. 18748/10, §§ 36-37, 2 December 2014).
• EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 35030/13

  Petra Reski

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 57676/11

  These principles also apply to the publication of books, in so far as they concern matters of public interest (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 43, ECHR 2004-IV, and Verlagsgruppe Droemer Knaur GmbH & Co. KG v. Germany, no. 35030/13, § 37, 19 October 2017).

 
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 57676/11

  These principles also apply to the publication of books, in so far as they concern matters of public interest (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 43, ECHR 2004-IV, and Verlagsgruppe Droemer Knaur GmbH & Co. KG v. Germany, no. 35030/13, § 37, 19 October 2017).
• EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

  LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 57676/11

  The Court considers that these principles are also relevant in the present case in which the author of the book was not a journalist but a writer (see, mutatis mutandis, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 51, ECHR 2007-IV, and Verlagsgruppe Droemer Knaur GmbH & Co. KG, cited above, § 44).
• EGMR, 04.06.2009 - 21277/05

  STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. AUSTRIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 57676/11

  However, the Court reiterates that while reporting on true facts about politicians" or other public persons" private life may be admissible in certain circumstances, even persons known to the public have a legitimate expectation of protection of, and respect for, their private life (see Standard Verlags GmbH v. Austria (no. 2), no. 21277/05, § 53, 4 June 2009, and Halldorsson v. Iceland, no. 44322/13, § 46, 4 July 2017).
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 57676/11

  40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 95-107, ECHR 2012; Axel Springer AG, cited above, §§ 78-88; and Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, §§ 83-92, 10 November 2015).
• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 25333/06

  EUROPAPRESS HOLDING D.O.O. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 57676/11

  The Court reiterates that placing such an onus on the defendant is not, in principle, incompatible with Article 10 of the Convention (see Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 93, ECHR 2005-II, and Europapress Holding d.o.o. v. Croatia, no. 25333/06, § 63, 22 October 2009).
• EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 44322/13

  HALLDÓRSSON v. ICELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 57676/11

  However, the Court reiterates that while reporting on true facts about politicians" or other public persons" private life may be admissible in certain circumstances, even persons known to the public have a legitimate expectation of protection of, and respect for, their private life (see Standard Verlags GmbH v. Austria (no. 2), no. 21277/05, § 53, 4 June 2009, and Halldorsson v. Iceland, no. 44322/13, § 46, 4 July 2017).