Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 26338/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,55607) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MURTAZIN v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
NIKITINE c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 26338/06
The Court has to assess whether the power to conduct a supervisory review was exercised by the authorities so as to strike, to the maximum extent possible, a fair balance between the interests of the individual and the need to ensure the proper administration of justice (see, mutatis mutandis, Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, §§ 57 and 59, ECHR 2004-...). - EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 15021/02
WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 26338/06
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see, for example, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; and, more recently, Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, 24 February 2005, Wasserman v. Russia (no. 1), no. 15021/02, 18 November 2004, and Sukhobokov, cited above). - EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 25964/02
POZNAKHIRINA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 26338/06
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see, for example, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; and, more recently, Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, 24 February 2005, Wasserman v. Russia (no. 1), no. 15021/02, 18 November 2004, and Sukhobokov, cited above). - EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 38368/04
SYPCHENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 26338/06
Departures from that principle are justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see (see, mutatis mutandis, Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-X; and Sypchenko v. Russia, no. 38368/04, § 26, 1 June 2007).