Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 29549/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,54226) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LB INTERFINANZ A.G. v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3 MRK
Preliminary objection dismissed (applicability) No violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EKMR, 10.12.1984 - 10259/83
S.p.r.l. ANCA and others v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 29549/04
The Court reiterates at the outset that the applicability of Article 6 § 1 to bankruptcy proceedings is beyond doubt (see S.p.r.l. ANCA and Others v. Belgium, no. 10259/83, Commission decision of 10 December 1984, Decisions and Reports 40, p. 170; Interfina and Christian della Faille d"Huysse v. Belgium, no. 11101/84, Commission decision of 4 May 1987, unreported; Ceteroni v. Italy, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V; Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, §§ 13 and 14, 11 December 2003; Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, § 86, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); and Sukobljevic v. Croatia, no. 5129/03, § 37, 2 November 2006). - EKMR, 04.05.1987 - 11101/84
INTERFINA et FAILLE d'HUYSSE contre la Belgique
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 29549/04
The Court reiterates at the outset that the applicability of Article 6 § 1 to bankruptcy proceedings is beyond doubt (see S.p.r.l. ANCA and Others v. Belgium, no. 10259/83, Commission decision of 10 December 1984, Decisions and Reports 40, p. 170; Interfina and Christian della Faille d"Huysse v. Belgium, no. 11101/84, Commission decision of 4 May 1987, unreported; Ceteroni v. Italy, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V; Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, §§ 13 and 14, 11 December 2003; Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, § 86, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); and Sukobljevic v. Croatia, no. 5129/03, § 37, 2 November 2006). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 29549/04
The Court has nevertheless to ascertain whether the proceedings considered as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was taken, were fair as required by Article 6 § 1 (see Schenk v. Switzerland, judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, § 46). - EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 29549/04
The Court reiterates that according to its case-law the principle of equality of arms requires that each party should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, § 33, and Ankerl v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, pp. 1567-68, § 38).