Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 10390/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15136) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BERDAJS v. SLOVENIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 57655/08
SUHADOLC v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 10390/09
For the relevant domestic law and practice see Suhadolc v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 57655/08, 17 May 2011.The Court notes that the principles regarding the requirement of an oral hearing in proceedings concerning minor offences were set out in Suhadolc v. Slovenia ((dec.), no. 57655/08, 17 May 2011) and Flisar (cited above, §§ 33-35).
- EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79
Öztürk ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 10390/09
Turning to the present case, the Court notes that it concerns a minor offence under the Road Traffic Safety Act, which, as such, does not belong to the traditional categories of criminal law (see, mutatis mutandis, Suhadolc, cited above; Kammerer v. Austria, no. 32435/06, § 28, 12 May 2010; and Öztürk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, § 51, Series A no. 73).
- EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 48134/15
BOJIC v. CROATIA
In these circumstances, in view of the general nature of the applicant's submissions (compare Berdajs v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10390/09, 27 March 2012), the Court is not persuaded that the minor offences court was not able to resolve the case adequately on the basis of the evidence so obtained and without the need to hold another hearing in the applicant's presence (see Suhadolc, cited above).