Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 65518/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,44000) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.09.2001 - 65518/01
- EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 65518/01
- EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 65518/01
- EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 65518/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79
DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 65518/01
It further reiterates that Article 5 § 3 enshrines a specific right, the object and purpose thereof being "a right to be brought promptly before a judge in case of detention effected in accordance with Article 5 § 1(c)" (see De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, §§ 44 and 51). - EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74
SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 65518/01
Accordingly, many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague and whose interpretation and application are questions of practice (see, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, § 49). - EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91
TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 65518/01
It implies qualitative requirements, notably those of "accessibility" and "foreseeability" (see, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, pp. 71-72, § 37). - EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11152/84
CIULLA v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 65518/01
This latter provision must be read in conjunction with Article 5 § 3, which together form a whole (see Ciulla v. Italy, judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, § 38).