Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VÖRDUR ÓLAFSSON c. ISLANDE

  Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 11 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VÖRDUR ÓLAFSSON v. ICELAND

  Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 11 (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VÖRDUR ÓLAFSSON v. ICELAND - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Violation of Art. 11

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)

  Olafsson v. Iceland

  [24.03.2009]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20161/06
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06
• EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 20161/06

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 11.01.2006 - 52562/99

  SØRENSEN ET RASMUSSEN c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06

  Thus the Court had correctly held that compulsion to join a particular trade union and to fund its activities contrary to the negative aspect of the right to freedom of association, "str[uck] at the very substance of the freedom of association guaranteed by Article 11" (he cited Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, § 55, Series A no. 44, and Sørensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark [GC], nos. 52562/99 and 52620/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-I).
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 47316/99

  Rechtssache F.-N. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06

  46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, § 86, ECHR 2005-VI; Wittek v. Germany, no. 37290/97, § 49, ECHR 2002-X; Forrer-Niedenthal v. Germany, no. 47316/99, § 39, 20 February 2003; and Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701/94, § 82, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 13.08.1981 - 7601/76

  YOUNG, JAMES ET WEBSTER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06

  Thus the Court had correctly held that compulsion to join a particular trade union and to fund its activities contrary to the negative aspect of the right to freedom of association, "str[uck] at the very substance of the freedom of association guaranteed by Article 11" (he cited Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, § 55, Series A no. 44, and Sørensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark [GC], nos. 52562/99 and 52620/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-I).

 
• EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90

  SIGURÐUR A. SIGURJÓNSSON v. ICELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06

  In the Government's opinion, there was a fundamental difference between the situation at issue in the present case and that in previous judgments by the Court concerning the negative aspects of the freedom of association, notably Young, James and Webster, cited above; Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland (30 June 1993, Series A no. 264); and Sørensen and Rasmussen, cited above.
• EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 30668/96

  WILSON, NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06

  30668/96, 30671/96 and 30678/96, § 44, ECHR 2002-V; and Sørensen and Rasmussen, cited above, § 58).
• EGMR, 09.11.2000 - 29529/95

  SCHETTINI AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06

  In the area of trade union freedom, in view of the sensitive character of the social and political issues involved in achieving a proper balance between the respective interests of labour and management, and given the wide degree of divergence between the domestic systems in this field, the Contracting States enjoy a wide margin of appreciation as to how the freedom of trade unions to protect the occupational interests of their members may be secured (see Swedish Engine Drivers" Union, cited above, § 39; Gustafsson, cited above, § 45; Schettini and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 29529/95, 9 November 2000; Wilson, National Union of Journalists and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos.
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94

  CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06

  Nor were the circumstances in the applicant's case comparable to those in Chassagnou and Others v. France ([GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, ECHR 1999-III).

• EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 31045/10

  THE NATIONAL UNION OF RAIL, MARITIME AND TRANSPORT WORKERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The domestic authorities" power of appreciation is not unlimited, however, but goes hand in hand with European supervision, it being the Court's task to give a final ruling on whether a particular restriction is reconcilable with freedom of association as protected by Article 11 (Vörður Ólafsson v. Iceland, no. 20161/06, § 76, ECHR 2010).