Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 7354/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,61166) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LEVADNA v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 71099/01
MONORY v. ROMANIA AND HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 7354/10
Relying on Article 8 of the Convention and on the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in cases concerning the application of that provision, including Monory v. Romania and Hungary (no. 71099/01, 5 April 2005); Maumousseau and Washington v. France (no. 39388/05, ECHR 2007-XIII); and Carlson v. Switzerland (no. 49492/06, 6 November 2008), the Court of Appeal found that the reunion of B. with his child at his habitual place of residence under the Hague Convention would be in accordance with the requirement to strike a fair balance between the competing interests of the applicant, her husband, their child, and of public order in this matter. - EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 39388/05
Maumousseau und Washington ./. Frankreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 7354/10
Relying on Article 8 of the Convention and on the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in cases concerning the application of that provision, including Monory v. Romania and Hungary (no. 71099/01, 5 April 2005); Maumousseau and Washington v. France (no. 39388/05, ECHR 2007-XIII); and Carlson v. Switzerland (no. 49492/06, 6 November 2008), the Court of Appeal found that the reunion of B. with his child at his habitual place of residence under the Hague Convention would be in accordance with the requirement to strike a fair balance between the competing interests of the applicant, her husband, their child, and of public order in this matter.