Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ERIKSEN c. NORVÈGE

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Non-violation de l'Art. 5-1 Non-violation de l'Art. 5-3 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ERIKSEN v. NORWAY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 5-1 No violation of Art. 5-3 (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 02.12.1992 - 17391/90
• EKMR, 31.08.1994 - 17391/90
• EGMR, 27.05.1997 - 17391/90

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11152/84

  CIULLA v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.1997 - 17391/90

  Against this background, the period of detention in question can be seen as closely linked to the original criminal proceedings in 1984 and the resulting conviction and security measures (see, mutatis mutandis, the Ciulla v. Italy judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 16, para. 38).

  [4] See the Ciulla v. Italy judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 16, para.

• EGMR, 24.06.1982 - 7906/77

  VAN DROOGENBROECK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.1997 - 17391/90

  The criteria of causal link had been applied by the Court in cases of quite a different nature, namely in relation to orders for re-detention imposed during the period of a judicial authorisation given on the basis of an initial conviction (see the Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium judgment of 24 June 1982, Series A no. 50, pp. 21-22, para. 40, and the Weeks v. the United Kingdom judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 26, para. 49).

  [6] See the Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium judgment of 24 June 1982, Series A no. 50, p. 19, para.

• EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86

  B. ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.1997 - 17391/90

  [5] See the B. v. Austria judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, pp.

 
• EGMR, 24.11.1994 - 17621/91

  KEMMACHE v. FRANCE (No. 3)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.1997 - 17391/90

  As the Court has held on several occasions, the expediency of obtaining evidence is primarily a matter for the national authorities and it is not for the Court to substitute its view for theirs in this respect (see, inter alia, the Kemmache v. France (no. 3) judgment of 24 November 1994, Series A no. 296-C, p. 88, para.
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.1997 - 17391/90

  1 (c) (art. 5-1-c), which should be given a narrow interpretation (see the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, pp. 38-39, para. 102).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

  Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.1997 - 17391/90

  In this connection, he referred to the Court's Wemhoff v. Germany judgment (27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 23, para. 9).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9787/82

  WEEKS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.1997 - 17391/90

  The criteria of causal link had been applied by the Court in cases of quite a different nature, namely in relation to orders for re-detention imposed during the period of a judicial authorisation given on the basis of an initial conviction (see the Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium judgment of 24 June 1982, Series A no. 50, pp. 21-22, para. 40, and the Weeks v. the United Kingdom judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 26, para. 49).
• EGMR, 05.11.1981 - 7215/75

  X v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.1997 - 17391/90

  However, the applicability of one ground does not necessarily preclude that of another; a detention may, depending on the circumstances, be justified under more than one sub-paragraph (see, for instance, the X v. the United Kingdom judgment of 5 November 1981, Series A no. 46, pp. 17-18, paras. 36-39).

• BVerfG, 20.06.2012 - 2 BvR 1048/11

  Vorbehaltene Sicherungsverwahrung ist - mit Ausnahme des Verstoßes gegen das …

  Diese ergab sich allein aus dem Gesetz (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 27. Mai 1997, Beschwerde-Nr. 17391/90, Eriksen ./. Norwegen).

  Unter diesen Umständen verwandelt sich eine Freiheitsentziehung, die zu Beginn rechtmäßig war, in eine willkürliche, mit Art. 5 EMRK nicht zu vereinbarende Freiheitsentziehung (vgl. EGMR…, Urteil vom 24. Juni 1982, Beschwerde-Nr. 7906/77, Van Droogenbroeck ./. Belgien, Rn. 40; Urteil vom 27. Mai 1997, Beschwerde-Nr. 17391/90, Eriksen ./. Norwegen, Rn. 78;… Urteil vom 17. Dezember 2009, Beschwerde-Nr. 19359/04, M. ./. Deutschland, Rn. 88).