Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NADBISKUPIJA ZAGREBACKA v. SLOVENIA

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2004 - 60376/00

  Moreover, it is primarily for the national administrative and judicial authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see, inter alia, Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97, 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II, and Houfova v. Czech Republic (dec.), no. 58177/00, 1 July 2003).
• EGMR, 03.07.2001 - 44142/98

  BUGARSKI ET VON VUCHETICH contre la SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2004 - 60376/00

  The hope that a long-extinguished property right may be revived cannot be regarded as a "possession", and neither can the hope of recognition of the survival of an old property right which it has long been impossible to exercise effectively, or a conditional claim which lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition (see Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII, Polacek and Polackova v. Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 38645/97, § 62, 10 July 2002, and Bugarski and von Vuchetich v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 44142/98, 3 July 2001).
• EGMR, 10.07.2002 - 38645/97

  POLACEK and POLACKOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2004 - 60376/00

  The hope that a long-extinguished property right may be revived cannot be regarded as a "possession", and neither can the hope of recognition of the survival of an old property right which it has long been impossible to exercise effectively, or a conditional claim which lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition (see Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII, Polacek and Polackova v. Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 38645/97, § 62, 10 July 2002, and Bugarski and von Vuchetich v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 44142/98, 3 July 2001).

• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 2792/02

  ZORC v. SLOVENIA

  Moreover, it is primarily for the national administrative and judicial authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see, inter alia, Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97, 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II, and Nadbiskupija Zagrebacka v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 60376/00, 27 May 2004).
• EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 44580/98

  SIRC v. SLOVENIA

  Moreover, it is primarily for the national administrative and judicial authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see, inter alia, Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97, 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II, and Nadbiskupija Zagrebacka v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 60376/00, 27 May 2004).