Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NASTESKA v. \

  Art. 6 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 12005/86

  BORGERS v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 23152/05

  The Court considers that even if the public prosecutor had not been permitted to make any comments, her presence at the Court of Appeal's private sitting afforded her, if only to outward appearances, an additional opportunity to bolster her opinion in private, without fear of contradiction by the applicant (see Borgers v. Belgium, 30 October 1991, § 28, Series A no. 214-B, and Lobo Machado v. Portugal, 20 February 1996, § 32, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 23152/05

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 21261/02

  IVANOVSKI v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 23152/05

  The Court observes that the principle of equality of arms implies that each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under conditions that do not place him or her at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his or her opponent (see Ivanovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 21261/02, 29 September 2005).

 
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 34215/02

  STOJANOV v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 23152/05

  In addition, the trial court's requests for expert examinations affected the length of the proceedings, in particular since some of them were inappropriate (see paragraph 12 above) (see Stojanov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 34215/02, § 60, 31 May 2007).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 26541/02

  NANKOV v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 23152/05

  In this context, it reiterates that, since the remittal of cases for re-examination is usually ordered as a result of errors committed by lower courts, the repetition of such orders within one set of proceedings discloses a serious deficiency in the judicial system (see Nankov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26541/02, § 48, 29 November 2007).
• LG Bonn, 25.09.2008 - 27 Qs 5/08

  Rechtmäßigkeit einer Durchsuchung von Geschäftsräumen aufgrund des Verdachts …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 23152/05

  27/08/2010.