Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BIÇICI v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) Violation of Art. 11 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

  Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 30357/05

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society, the Court refers, firstly, to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III, and Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 32, Series A no. 139).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 30357/05

  Furthermore, where allegations are made under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 30357/05

  As the Court has underlined on many occasions, Article 3 enshrines one of the most fundamental values of democratic societies; it makes no provision for exceptions and no derogation from it is permissible under Article 15 § 2 (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V, and Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 93, Reports 1998-VIII).

 
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 30357/05

  Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 30357/05

  Thus, in the particular circumstances of the present case, it cannot be said that the police were called upon to react without prior preparation (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 30357/05

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society, the Court refers, firstly, to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III, and Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 32, Series A no. 139).
• EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01

  OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 30357/05

  It is clear from this case-law that the authorities have a duty to take appropriate measures with regard to lawful demonstrations in order to ensure their peaceful conduct and the safety of all citizens (see Balçık and Others, cited above, § 46, and Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-XIII).

• EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 18968/07

  V.C. v. SLOVAKIA

  En particulier, tout comme dans les affaires soulevant des questions sous l'angle de l'article 2 de la Convention, il est obligatoire de mener une enquête officielle effective (voir, par exemple, Assenov et autres c. Bulgarie, 28 octobre 1998, § 102, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1998-VIII, et Biçici c. Turquie, no 30357/05, § 39, 27 mai 2010, et autres références citées).
• EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 35880/14

  ZAKHAROV AND VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA

  The Court has previously found violations of Article 3 of the Convention where police officers failed to show the required degree of tolerance and restraint when dispersing peaceful gatherings (see, for example, Biçici v. Turkey, no. 30357/05, §§ 35-36, 27 May 2010).