Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 62736/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,14287) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VASSIS ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-3 - Aussitôt traduite devant un juge ou autre magistrat) Préjudice moral - réparation ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VASSIS AND OTHERS v. FRANCE [Extracts]
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Brought promptly before judge or other officer) Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Vassis and Others v. France
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
VASSIS ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 62736/09
- EGMR, 17.12.2014 - 62736/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 01.07.1961 - 332/57
LAWLESS c. IRLANDE (N° 3)
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 62736/09
Since Article 5 § 1 (c) forms a whole with Article 5 § 3, "competent legal authority" in paragraph 1 (c) is a synonym, of abbreviated form, for "judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power" in paragraph 3 (see, among other authorities, Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, Series A no. 3, and Schiesser, cited above, § 29). - EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03
McKAY c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 62736/09
Reiterating the principles set out in McKay v. United Kingdom ([GC], no. 543/03, ECHR 2006-X) and reaffirmed in Medvedyev and Others (cited above), the applicants observed that the supervision conducted had to include effective safeguards against the risk of ill-treatment, which was at its greatest in the case of detainees isolated on the high seas under the surveillance of military personnel who were not trained to guard prisoners, and outside any kind of independent supervision. - EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 26144/95
IKINCISOY v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 62736/09
Nevertheless, while the Court has previously held that a delay of two or three days before a person is brought before "a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power" meets the promptness requirement embodied in the words "brought promptly before", this concerned cases in which the beginning of a period of police custody had coincided with that of the deprivation of liberty (see, inter alia, Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 51, ECHR 1999-III; Ayaz and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 11804/02, 27 May 2004; and Ikincisoy v. Turkey, no. 26144/95, § 103, 27 July 2004). - EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79
DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 62736/09
Moreover, the Court reiterates that each individual case must be examined in the light of its specific features (see, among other authorities, De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 52, Series A no. 77).