Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 50446/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,21245) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JANKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA (No. 2)
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)
- Anwaltsblatt
EMRK Art. 8
Krimineller Polizeibeamter darf nicht Anwalt werden - Anwaltsblatt
EMRK Art. 8
Krimineller Polizeibeamter darf nicht Anwalt werden - juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Papierfundstellen
- NJW 2018, 3371
- AnwBl 2017, 888
- AnwBl Online 2017, 459
Wird zitiert von ... (4)
- EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 57292/16
Recht auf Vergessenwerden: Den Unfallverursacher nicht beim Namen nennen
Dans une telle situation, le casier judiciaire de la personne peut prendre une importance nouvelle, que les condamnations antérieures soient considérées ou non comme « prescrites'(Jankauskas c. Lituanie (no 2), no 50446/09, 27 juin 2017, où la Cour a considéré qu'il est légitime de s'appuyer sur des condamnations prescrites pour évaluer l'envergure morale d'une personne). - EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 54588/13
GULIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
While no general right to employment or to the renewal of a fixed-term contract, right of access to the civil service or right to choose a particular profession can be derived from Article 8, the notion of "private life" does not exclude, in principle, activities of a professional or business nature (see Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030/07, §§ 109-10, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Barbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, § 71, 5 September 2017; and Jankauskas v. Lithuania (no. 2), no. 50446/09, §§ 56-57, 27 June 2017). - EGMR - 25336/22 (anhängig)
MANKUS v. LITHUANIA
Has there been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention? In particular, has there been an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, on account of the courts' finding that he is prohibited from working in statutory organisations due to his previous conviction (see Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, §§ 92-117, 25 September 2018, and Jankauskas v. Lithuania (no. 2), no. 50446/09, §§ 56-58, 27 June 2017; see also, mutatis mutandis, Grazuleviciute v. Lithuania, no. 53176/17, §§ 95-111, 14 December 2021)?. - EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 74354/13
NAMAZOV v. AZERBAIJAN
In addition, professional associations of lawyers play a fundamental role in ensuring the protection of human rights and must therefore be able to act independently, and respect towards professional colleagues and self-regulation of the legal profession are paramount (see Jankauskas v. Lithuania (no. 2), no. 50446/09, § 78, 27 June 2017).