Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 70329/12, 9041/13, 9755/13, 15901/13, 27320/13, 61147/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 70329/12, 9041/13, 9755/13, 15901/13, 27320/13, 61147/14 (https://dejure.org/2017,21241)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.06.2017 - 70329/12, 9041/13, 9755/13, 15901/13, 27320/13, 61147/14 (https://dejure.org/2017,21241)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. Juni 2017 - 70329/12, 9041/13, 9755/13, 15901/13, 27320/13, 61147/14 (https://dejure.org/2017,21241)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,21241) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LAZARENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (6) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 70329/12
The Court reiterates that the principle of equality of arms requires that each party should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under conditions that do not place him or her at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his or her opponent (see Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 33, Series A no. 274, and Avotins v. Latvia [GC], no. 17502/07, § 119, ECHR 2016). - EGMR, 23.06.1993 - 12952/87
RUIZ-MATEOS c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 70329/12
However, the general concept of a fair trial, encompassing the fundamental principle that proceedings should be adversarial (see Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain, 23 June 1993, § 63, Series A no. 262), requires that the person against whom proceedings have been initiated should be informed of this fact (see Dilipak and Karakaya v. Turkey, nos. 7942/05 and 24838/05, § 77, 4 March 2014). - EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 65518/01
SALOV v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 70329/12
This amounted to a breach of the principle of equality of arms (compare Beer, cited above, §§ 19-21, and Salov v. Ukraine, no. 65518/01, § 88, ECHR 2005-VIII (extracts)).
- EGMR, 19.10.2023 - 59487/21
BUDVEST, TOV v. UKRAINE
In the leading case of Lazarenko and Others v. Ukraine (nos. 70329/12 and 5 others, 27 June 2017), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.70329/12 and 5 others, 27 June 2017);.
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 5800/22
DIDENKO v. UKRAINE
In the leading case of Lazarenko and Others v. Ukraine (no. 70329/12 and 5 others, 27 June 2017), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. - EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 50704/15
YAKOVLYEVA v. UKRAINE
In the leading cases of Lazarenko and Others v. Ukraine (nos. 70329/12 and 5 others, 27 June 2017) and Strizhak v. Ukraine (no. 72269/01, 8 November 2005), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
- EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 42991/13
BOLYUKH AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
In the leading case of Lazarenko and Others v. Ukraine, (nos. 70329/12 and 5 others, 27 June 2017), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. - EGMR - 27358/16 (anhängig)
CHEREDNICHENKO v. UKRAINE and 3 other applications
70329/12 and 5 others, §§ 36-44, 27 June 2017)?. - EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 18015/19
GROS v. UKRAINE
However, in the present case it has been demonstrated, and confirmed by both parties, that on 26 March 2018 the applicant had been informed of the pending proceedings before the court of cassation (see, a contrario, Lazarenko and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 70329/12 and 5 others, §§ 38-43, 27 June 2017).