Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1991,12336
EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87 (https://dejure.org/1991,12336)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.08.1991 - 13057/87 (https://dejure.org/1991,12336)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. August 1991 - 13057/87 (https://dejure.org/1991,12336)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1991,12336) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    DEMICOLI v. MALTA

    Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection rejected (six month period) Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-2 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    DEMICOLI c. MALTE

    Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
    Exception préliminaire rejetée (délai de six mois) Violation de l'art. 6-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 6-2 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement frais ...

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • NJW 1992, 2619
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (63)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 11034/84

    WEBER c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87
    The Court has already had to determine similar issues in other cases (see the Weber judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, p. 17, para. 30, and the other judgments referred to therein).

    A factor of greater importance is "the very nature of the offence" in question (see, inter alia, the above-mentioned Campbell and Fell judgment, Series A no. 80, p. 36, para. 71, and the above-mentioned Weber judgment, Series A no. 177, p. 18, para. 32).

    From this point of view, therefore, the particular breach of privilege in question is akin to a criminal offence under the Press Act 1974 (see, mutatis mutandis, the above-mentioned Weber judgment, Series A no. 177, p. 18 para. 33 in fine).

  • EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

    CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87
    82) and have been consistently applied in the Court's subsequent case-law (see, apart from the judgments referred to above, the Öztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, and the Campbell and Fell judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80).

    A factor of greater importance is "the very nature of the offence" in question (see, inter alia, the above-mentioned Campbell and Fell judgment, Series A no. 80, p. 36, para. 71, and the above-mentioned Weber judgment, Series A no. 177, p. 18, para. 32).

  • EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

    HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87
    In this context even appearances may be of a certain importance, particularly as far as criminal proceedings are concerned (see, amongst other authorities, the Hauschildt judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154, p. 21, paras. 46-48).

    Already for this reason, the impartiality of the adjudicating body in these proceedings would appear to be open to doubt and the applicant's fears in this connection were justified (see the above-mentioned Hauschildt judgment, Series A no. 154, p. 23, para. 52).

  • EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82

    BRICMONT v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87
    The Court has consistently held that reimbursement may be ordered in respect of costs and expenses that (a) were actually and necessarily incurred by the injured party in order to seek, through the domestic legal system, prevention or rectification of a violation, to have the same established by the Commission and later by the Court and to obtain redress therefor, and (b) are reasonable as to quantum (see, among other authorities, the Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 33, para. 101).
  • EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

    BOZANO v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87
    The question remains open and the Court does not propose to decide it for the time being (see, mutatis mutandis, the Bozano judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 111, p. 22, para. 50 in fine).
  • EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

    BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87
    1 (art. 6-1) itself" (see the Belilos judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132, p. 29, para. 64).
  • EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

    Öztürk ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87
    82) and have been consistently applied in the Court's subsequent case-law (see, apart from the judgments referred to above, the Öztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, and the Campbell and Fell judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80).
  • EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

    RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87
    Accordingly it fulfilled all the requirements of a tribunal set out in the Ringeisen judgment of 16 July 1971 (Series A no. 13, p. 39, para. 95).
  • EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 29381/09

    Homosexualität in Griechenland

    Parti communiste unifié de Turquie et autres c. Turquie, 30 janvier 1998, §§ 29-30, Recueil 1998-I et, encore plus explicitement, Dumitru Popescu (no 2), précité, § 103. Non seulement la pratique de la Cour mais aussi l'acceptation des Etats parties confirment cette interprétation (voir les amendements constitutionnels adoptés après l'arrêt du 27 août 1991 dans l'affaire Demicoli c. Malte, série A no 210, suivi de la résolution DH (95) 211 du 11 septembre 1995 ; après l'arrêt adopté le 29 octobre 992 dans l'affaire Open Door et Dublin Well Woman c. Irlande, série A no 246-A, suivi de la résolution DH (96) 386 du 26 juin 1996 ; et après l'arrêt adopté le 23 octobre 1995 dans l'affaire Palaoro c. Autriche, série A no 329-B, suivi de la résolution DH (96) 150 du 15 mai 1996).
  • EGMR, 09.02.1995 - 17440/90

    WELCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    1 (art. 6-1), une portée autonome (voir notamment, pour ce qui est des "droits de caractère civil", l'arrêt X c. France du 31 mars 1992, série A no 234-C, p. 98, par. 28, et, pour ce qui est des "accusations en matière pénale", l'arrêt Demicoli c. Malte du 27 août 1991, série A no 210, pp. 15-16, par. 31).
  • EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

    Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als

    (ii) The notion of "penalty" 96. The notion of "penalty" in Article 7 § 1 of the Convention, like those of "civil rights and obligations" and "criminal charge" in Article 6 § 1, has an autonomous meaning (see in particular, regarding "civil rights", X v. France, 31 March 1992, § 28, Series A no. 234-C, and, on the subject of "criminal charges", Demicoli v. Malta, 27 August 1991, § 31, Series A no. 210).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht