Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  H.K. v. FINLAND

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 13 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 36065/97
• EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 36065/97

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 48518/99

  LUNDKVIST contre la SUEDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 36065/97

  The Court further finds that the authorities in no way stated that the conditions were fulfilled for holding the applicant criminally liable with regard to the charges on account of which he had been acquitted (see Lundkvist v. Sweden (dec.), no. 48518/99, ECHR 2003-XI and O.L. v. Finland (dec.), no. 61110/00, 5 July 2005).
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 61110/00

  O.L. v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 36065/97

  The Court further finds that the authorities in no way stated that the conditions were fulfilled for holding the applicant criminally liable with regard to the charges on account of which he had been acquitted (see Lundkvist v. Sweden (dec.), no. 48518/99, ECHR 2003-XI and O.L. v. Finland (dec.), no. 61110/00, 5 July 2005).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 36065/97

  It prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person charged with the criminal offence is guilty before he has been so proved according to law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, § 37).

 
• EGMR, 19.12.1994 - 15153/89

  VEREINIGUNG DEMOKRATISCHER SOLDATEN ÖSTERREICHS AND GUBI v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 36065/97

  However, the effectiveness of the remedy for the purpose of Article 13 does not depend on the certainty of a favourable outcome (see Vereinigung demokratischer Soldaten Österreichs and Gubi v. Austria, judgment of 19 December 1994, Series A no. 302, § 55).
• EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83

  OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 36065/97

  The Court reiterates the guiding principle whereby a care order should be regarded as a temporary measure, to be discontinued as soon as circumstances permit, and that any measures implementing temporary care should be consistent with the ultimate aim of reuniting the natural parents and the child (see, in particular, Olsson (no. 1), judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, pp.
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 36065/97

  As to the complaint about the alleged breach of Article 6 § 2 by the social welfare authorities and the administrative courts, the Court reiterates that the presumption of innocence enshrined in Article 6 § 2 is one of the elements of the fair criminal trial that is required by paragraph 1 (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, § 35).
• EGMR, 25.08.1993 - 13126/87

  SEKANINA c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 36065/97

  Article 6 § 2 may also be applicable where the criminal proceedings proper have terminated in an acquittal and other courts issue decisions voicing the continued existence of suspicion regarding the accused's innocence or otherwise casting doubt on the correctness of the acquittal (see in particular the following judgments: Sekanina v. Austria, judgment of 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-A, § 30; O. v. Norway, no. 29327/95, §§ 34-38, ECHR 2003-II and Y v. Norway, no. 56580/00, §§ 43-47, ECHR 2003-II (extracts)).