Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PERUS v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 - Independent tribunal) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 35016/05
• EGMR, 14.02.2018 - 35016/05

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 27.04.2000 - 45023/98

  BEN SALAH ADRAQUI and DHAIME v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 35016/05

  In this connection, the Court observes that applicants must comply with the applicable rules and procedures of domestic law when making use of domestic remedies (see Begus v. Slovenia, no. 25634/05, § 29, 15 December 2011, and Ben Salah, Araqui and Dhaime v. Spain (dec.), no. 45023/98, ECHR 2000-IV), and finds that the present applicant failed to do so.
• EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 34130/96

  MOREL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 35016/05

  In this regard, the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (see, among other authorities, Padovani v. Italy, 26 February 1993, § 26, Series A no. 257-B, and Morel v. France, no. 34130/96, § 41, ECHR 2000-VI).
• EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 463/03

  KORENJAK v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 35016/05

  However, the 2006 Act, on which the applicant also relied in his claim, provided for a special compensatory remedy which was found in Korenjak v. Slovenia ((dec.), no. 463/03, 15 May 2007) and Carevic v. Slovenia ((dec.), no. 17314/03, 3 June 2008) to constitute an appropriate means of redressing a violation of the right to have one's case examined within a reasonable time.

 
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 40984/07

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 35016/05

  According to the Court's constant case-law, when the impartiality of a tribunal for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 is being determined, regard must be had to the personal conviction and behaviour of a particular judge in a given case - the subjective approach - as well as to whether sufficient guarantees were afforded to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect - the objective approach (see Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797/01, § 118, ECHR 2005-..., and Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40984/07, § 136, 22 April 2010).
• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 25634/05

  BEGUS v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 35016/05

  In this connection, the Court observes that applicants must comply with the applicable rules and procedures of domestic law when making use of domestic remedies (see Begus v. Slovenia, no. 25634/05, § 29, 15 December 2011, and Ben Salah, Araqui and Dhaime v. Spain (dec.), no. 45023/98, ECHR 2000-IV), and finds that the present applicant failed to do so.
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 35016/05

  What is at stake is the confidence which the courts in a democratic society must inspire in the public (see De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 26, Series A no. 86).
• EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87

  PADOVANI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 35016/05

  In this regard, the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (see, among other authorities, Padovani v. Italy, 26 February 1993, § 26, Series A no. 257-B, and Morel v. France, no. 34130/96, § 41, ECHR 2000-VI).
• EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 17314/03

  CAREVIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 35016/05

  However, the 2006 Act, on which the applicant also relied in his claim, provided for a special compensatory remedy which was found in Korenjak v. Slovenia ((dec.), no. 463/03, 15 May 2007) and Carevic v. Slovenia ((dec.), no. 17314/03, 3 June 2008) to constitute an appropriate means of redressing a violation of the right to have one's case examined within a reasonable time.