Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 23496/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,30405
EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 23496/13 (https://dejure.org/2016,30405)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.09.2016 - 23496/13 (https://dejure.org/2016,30405)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. September 2016 - 23496/13 (https://dejure.org/2016,30405)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,30405) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    VUKOSAVLJEVIC v. SERBIA

    Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 30.10.2007 - 17556/05

    MARCIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 23496/13
    As regards the pecuniary damage, it is observed that a judgment, in which the Court finds a violation of the Convention or of its Protocols, imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found (see Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 71-73, ECHR 2006-XIV, Marcic and Others, no. 17556/05, §§ 64-65, 30 October 2007; and Pralica v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 38945/05, § 19, 27 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 38945/05

    PRALICA v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 23496/13
    As regards the pecuniary damage, it is observed that a judgment, in which the Court finds a violation of the Convention or of its Protocols, imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found (see Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 71-73, ECHR 2006-XIV, Marcic and Others, no. 17556/05, §§ 64-65, 30 October 2007; and Pralica v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 38945/05, § 19, 27 January 2009).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht