Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ANDREOU v. TURKEY

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 45653/99
• EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

  ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  The Court reiterates that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention, and that this may, in appropriate cases, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, among other authorities, Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 127, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

  KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  The Government also pointed out that in the case of Karner v. Austria (no. 40016/98, ECHR 2003-IX), the Court had accepted that the proceedings could be continued after the applicant's death, but considered that in the absence of an injured party no award could be made under Article 41 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22492/93

  KILIÇ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  The first sentence of Article 2 § 1 enjoins the State to take appropriate steps within its internal legal order to safeguard the lives of those within its jurisdiction (see Kılıç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 62, ECHR 2000-III).

 
• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  In relation to this, the degree and type of force used and the intention or aim behind the use of force may, among other factors, be relevant (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no 50385/99, §§ 49-52, ECHR 2004-XI, and EvrÑ?m Å�ktem v. Turkey, no. 9207/03, §§ 39-40, 4 November 2008).
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 9207/03

  EVRIM ÖKTEM c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  In relation to this, the degree and type of force used and the intention or aim behind the use of force may, among other factors, be relevant (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no 50385/99, §§ 49-52, ECHR 2004-XI, and EvrÑ?m Å�ktem v. Turkey, no. 9207/03, §§ 39-40, 4 November 2008).
• EGMR, 25.03.1994 - 17116/90

  SCHERER v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  Although the heirs of a deceased applicant cannot claim a general right for the examination of the application brought by the latter to be continued by the Court (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287), the Court has accepted on a number of occasions that close relatives of a deceased applicant are entitled to take his or her place (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 37, Series A no. 35, and Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A).
• EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87

  RAIMONDO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  Although the heirs of a deceased applicant cannot claim a general right for the examination of the application brought by the latter to be continued by the Court (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287), the Court has accepted on a number of occasions that close relatives of a deceased applicant are entitled to take his or her place (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 37, Series A no. 35, and Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324).
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  Although the heirs of a deceased applicant cannot claim a general right for the examination of the application brought by the latter to be continued by the Court (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287), the Court has accepted on a number of occasions that close relatives of a deceased applicant are entitled to take his or her place (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 37, Series A no. 35, and Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A).
• EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 42295/98

  NERVA ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99

  For the purposes of the instant case, the Court is prepared to accept that the applicant's husband and children can pursue the application initially brought by Mrs Georgia Andreou (see, mutatis mutandis, Kirilova and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 42908/98, 44038/98, 44816/98 and 7319/02, § 85, 9 June 2005, and Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII).

• EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 13320/02

  KYRIACOU TSIAKKOURMAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  In its judgment in the case of Cyprus v. Turkey (cited above, §§ 82-102), and in numerous subsequent judgments (see, for instance, Adali v. Turkey, no. 38187/97, § 186, 31 March 2005; Andreou v. Turkey (dec.), no. 45653/99, 3 June 2008; and Kallis and Androulla Panayi, cited above, § 32), the Court held that for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, remedies available in the "TRNC" could be regarded as "domestic remedies" of the respondent State and that the question of their effectiveness was to be considered in the specific circumstances in which it arose.