Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NABOYSHCHIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Naboyshchikov v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 09.06.1998 - 22496/93

  TEKIN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty or, more generally, confronted by security forces, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 (see Tekin v. Turkey, no. 22496/93, §§ 52 and 53, Reports 1998-IV; Assenov and Others, cited above, § 94; Labita v. Italy [GC], cited above, § 120; and Güzel Sahin and Others v. Turkey, no. 68263/01, § 46, 21 December 2006).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  Article 3 makes no provision for exceptions and no derogation from it is permissible under Article 15 § 2 of the Convention even in the event of a public emergency threatening the life of the nation (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V, and Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 93, Reports 1998-VIII).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  An obligation to investigate "is not an obligation of result, but of means": not every investigation should necessarily be successful or come to a conclusion which coincides with the claimant's account of events; however, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III).

 
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  Even in the most difficult circumstances, such as the fight against terrorism and organised crime, the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the victim's conduct (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV, and Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 79, Reports 1996-V).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  Further, the Court reiterates that for an investigation into alleged torture or ill-treatment by State officials to be effective, it should be independent from those implicated in the events (see Mehmet Emin Yüksel v. Turkey, no. 40154/98, § 37, 20 July 2004) and expeditious (see Labita, cited above, §§ 133 et seq.; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI; Tekin, cited above, § 67; and Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  In all cases, however, the complainant must be afforded effective access to the investigatory procedure (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 137, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts), with further references).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  However, the force applied should be necessary and proportionate in the circumstances of the case (see, among many other authorities, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 76, ECHR 2000-XII, and Altay v. Turkey, no. 22279/93, § 54, 22 May 2001).
• EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 22279/93

  ALTAY c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  However, the force applied should be necessary and proportionate in the circumstances of the case (see, among many other authorities, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 76, ECHR 2000-XII, and Altay v. Turkey, no. 22279/93, § 54, 22 May 2001).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  An obligation to investigate "is not an obligation of result, but of means": not every investigation should necessarily be successful or come to a conclusion which coincides with the claimant's account of events; however, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

• EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 53087/07

  MUSTAFA ALDEMIR c. TURQUIE

  Dans des affaires précédentes, des constats de violation de l'article 3 ont été justifiés par le fait que des militaires avaient visé des organes vitaux alors que cela n'était pas indispensable (Günaydın c. Turquie, précité, §§ 32-33) ou qu'ils avaient tiré à plusieurs reprises sans que ce soit justifié (Naboyshchikov c. Russie, no 21240/05, §§ 62-64, 27 octobre 2011).