|EGMR, 27.10.2015 - 39951/08|
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BRÂNDUSE v. ROMANIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Vote) (englisch)
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 65980/13
NENCIU v. ROMANIAThe Court reiterates that in a recent case it has rejected a similar objection related to the six-month rule and the alleged vexatious nature of the complaint, on the ground that the disenfranchisement provision produced a continuing state of affairs against which no domestic remedy was in fact available to the applicant, and which could end only when the provision in question was no longer in force or when it was no longer applicable to the applicant (see Brânduse v. Romania (no. 2), no. 39951/08, § 38, 27 October 2015; see also Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos.
- EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 63849/09
KULINSKI AND SABEV v. BULGARIAThe Court has repeatedly read into this Article the existence of individual subjective rights of participation - the "right to vote" and the "right to stand for election to the legislature", as protected by the positive obligation of the State to effectively ensure those rights to individuals under its jurisdiction (see Scoppola (no. 3), cited above, § 81; Anchugov and Gladkov, cited above, § 93; and Brânduse v. Romania (no. 2), no. 39951/08, § 44, 27 October 2015).
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.