Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 29765/02, 31420/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,55326) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BARISIK AND ALP v. TURKEY
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93
ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 29765/02
Consequently, regard being had to the generally recognised rules of international law, it is not necessary to try this remedy in order to comply with the requirements of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 45, ECHR 1999-VI). - EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65
DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 29765/02
Where, however, domestic law provides for a right of appeal, the appeal proceedings will be treated as an extension of the trial process and accordingly will be subject to Article 6 (Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, § 25). - EGMR, 23.02.1994 - 16757/90
STANFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 29765/02
Such rights are implicit in the very notion of an adversarial procedure and can also be derived from the guarantees contained in sub-paragraphs (c) and (e) of Article 6 § 3 (see, among others, Stanford v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 23 February 1994, Series A no. 282-A, pp. 10-11, § 26).