Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,49479
EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04 (https://dejure.org/2007,49479)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.11.2007 - 32457/04 (https://dejure.org/2007,49479)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. November 2007 - 32457/04 (https://dejure.org/2007,49479)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,49479) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BRECKNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 2 (lack of independence of the investigating body during the initial stages of the investigation) Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (28)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97

    WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04
    There was, accordingly, a powerful argument in support of the simple application of the clear limitation rule in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (relying on McDaid and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 25681/94, Commission decision of 9 April 1996, Decisions and Reports (DR) 85-A, p. 134 and Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I.
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04
    Furthermore, even where there may be obstacles or difficulties which prevent progress in an investigation in a particular situation, a prompt response by the authorities is vital in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 111 and 114, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

    AVSAR c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04
    The obligation is of means only (Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 394, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)) However, as in this case, it may be that some time later, information purportedly casting new light on the circumstances of the death comes into the public domain.
  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04
    The obligation to carry out an effective investigation into unlawful or suspicious deaths is well-established in the Court's case-law (for a full statement of principles by the Grand Chamber, see, most recently, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 110-113, ECHR 2005-VII).
  • EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 25681/94

    MCDAID ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04
    There was, accordingly, a powerful argument in support of the simple application of the clear limitation rule in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (relying on McDaid and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 25681/94, Commission decision of 9 April 1996, Decisions and Reports (DR) 85-A, p. 134 and Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I.
  • EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 5786/08

    Gesetzeslücke: Menschenrechtsgerichtshof verurteilt Schweden wegen Nacktaufnahmen

    Concernant des actes d'une telle gravité, l'obligation positive qui incombe à l'Etat en vertu des articles 3 et 8 de protéger l'intégrité physique de l'individu peut s'étendre aux questions touchant à l'effectivité d'une enquête pénale (voir, parmi d'autres, C.A.S. et C.S. c. Roumanie, précité, § 72, 20 mars 2012, M.P. et autres c. Bulgarie, précité, §§ 109-110, et M.C. c. Bulgarie, précité, § 152) et à la possibilité d'obtenir redressement et réparation (voir, mutatis mutandis, C.A.S. et C.S. c. Roumanie, précité, § 72), même s'il n'existe pas un droit absolu à obtenir l'ouverture de poursuites contre une personne donnée, ou la condamnation de celle-ci, lorsqu'il n'y a pas eu de défaillances blâmables dans les efforts déployés pour obliger les auteurs d'infractions pénales à rendre des comptes (voir, par exemple, Brecknell c. Royaume-Uni, no 32457/04, § 64, 27 novembre 2007, et Szula c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 18727/06, 4 janvier 2007).
  • EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06

    ASLAKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Even where there may be obstacles which prevent progress in an investigation in a particular situation, a prompt response by the authorities is vital in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 111 and 114, ECHR 2001-III; and Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, § 65, 27 November 2007).

    The Court also notes that there is little ground to be overly prescriptive as regards the possibility of an obligation to investigate unlawful killings arising many years after the events, since the public interest in obtaining the prosecution and conviction of perpetrators is firmly recognised, particularly in the context of war crimes and crimes against humanity (see Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, § 69, 27 November 2007).

  • EGMR, 18.09.2009 - 16064/90

    VARNAVA ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Even where there may be obstacles which prevent progress in an investigation in a particular situation, a prompt response by the authorities is vital in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 111 and 114, ECHR 2001-III; and Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, § 65, 27 November 2007).
  • EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 57856/11

    JELIC v. CROATIA

    In this context, it should be noted that there is little ground to be overly prescriptive as regards the possibility of an obligation to investigate unlawful killings arising many years after the events, since the public interest in obtaining the prosecution and conviction of perpetrators is firmly recognised, particularly in the context of war crimes and crimes against humanity (see Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, § 69, 27 November 2007).

    Such an obligation on the part of the authorities to take investigative measures may be triggered when a plausible, credible allegation, piece of evidence or item of information comes to light which is relevant to the identification and eventual prosecution or punishment of those responsible (see Gutiérrez Dorado and Dorado Ortiz v. Spain (dec.), no. 30141/09, §§ 39-41, 27 March 2012; Çakir and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 7864/06, 29 April 2010; and Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, §§ 66-72, 27 November 2007).

  • EGMR, 25.01.2018 - 38766/15

    MILIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

    As to the steps taken after 11 August 2015, the Court reiterates that where information purportedly casting new light on the circumstances of a death comes into the public domain, a new obligation to investigate the death may arise (see Hackett v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34698/04, 10 May 2005; Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, §§ 66-67, 27 November 2007; Williams v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32567/06, 17 February 2009; Gasyak and Others v. Turkey, no. 27872/03, § 60, 13 October 2009; and Harrison and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 44301/13, § 51, 25 March 2014).

    However, where events took place far in the past, due to the lapse of time, the level of urgency may have diminished; the immediacy of required investigative steps in the aftermath of an incident is likely to be absent (see Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, §§ 79-81, 27 November 2007).

  • EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 39468/13

    OBAJDIN v. CROATIA

    As to the steps taken after October 2012, the Court further reiterates that where information purportedly casting new light on the circumstances of a death comes into the public domain, a new obligation to investigate the death may arise (see Hackett v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34698/04, 10 May 2005; Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, §§ 66-67, 27 November 2007; Williams v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32567/06, 17 February 2009; Gasyak and Others v. Turkey, no. 27872/03, § 60, 13 October 2009; and Harrison and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 44301/13, § 51, 25 March 2014).

    However, where events took place far in the past, due to the lapse of time, the level of urgency may have diminished; the immediacy of required investigative steps in the aftermath of an incident is likely to be absent (see Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, §§ 79-81, 27 November 2007).

  • EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 30141/09

    GUTIERREZ DORADO AND DORADO ORTIZ v. SPAIN

    In this context, it should be noted that there is little ground to be overly prescriptive as regards the possibility of an obligation to investigate unlawful killings arising many years after the events since the public interest in obtaining the prosecution and conviction of perpetrators is firmly recognised, particularly in the context of war crimes and crimes against humanity (Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, § 69, 27 November 2007; see, with regard to Article 7, Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no. 36376/04, ECHR 2010).

    While the Court's case-law indicates that where new evidence or information arises concerning an unlawful killing (and, impliedly, a life-threatening disappearance) fresh obligations may arise for the authorities to take further investigative measures (Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, § 71, 27 November 2007, and Karefyllides and Others, cited above), it is not apparent that this assists the applicants" case as regards the six-month rule.

  • EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 43134/05

    G.N. u.a. ./. Italien

    En outre, en diverses occasions, la violation de l'obligation procédurale découlant de l'article 2 a été alléguée en l'absence de grief relatif à l'aspect matériel de cette disposition (Calvelli et Ciglio, précité, §§ 41-57 ; Byrzykowski c. Pologne, no 11562/05, §§ 86 et 94-118, 27 juin 2006 ; et Brecknell c. Royaume-Uni, no 32457/04, § 53, 27 novembre 2007).
  • EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 13660/05

    TEKÇI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Les investigations doivent notamment être approfondies, impartiales et attentives (McCann et autres, précité, §§ 161-163, Çakıcı, précité, § 86, et Brecknell c. Royaume-Uni, no 32457/04, §§ 65-72, 27 novembre 2007).
  • EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 52577/15

    TODOROVIC v. CROATIA

    As to the steps taken after 24 September 2015, the Court reiterates that where information purportedly casting new light on the circumstances of a death comes into the public domain, a new obligation to investigate the death may arise (see Hackett v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34698/04, 10 May 2005; Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, §§ 66-67, 27 November 2007; Williams v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32567/06, 17 February 2009; Gasyak and Others v. Turkey, no. 27872/03, § 60, 13 October 2009; and Harrison and Others, cited above, § 51).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2022 - 28864/18

    GRIBBEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 20147/15

    OLEWNIK-CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 44938/12

    BAL c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 49484/22

    OBIE DARKO ET MOUVEMENT CITOYEN TOUS MIGRANTS c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 1108/02

    KOLEVI v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 02.04.2020 - 8938/07

    KUKHALASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  • EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 12938/07

    CERF v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 51987/07

    ATALLAH c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 44562/15

    ÖZDEMIR c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 06.07.2017 - 80960/12

    ZDJELAR AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 22261/10

    CEYLAN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 20106/06

    MARTA JULARIC v. CROATIA

  • EGMR - 59623/08 (anhängig)

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 56840/10

    ÇELIK c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 06.07.2017 - 12986/13

    TRIVKANOVIC v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 50175/12

    M. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 44301/13

    HARRISON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 70273/11

    BOROJEVIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht