Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 33017/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,71027) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WOJCICKA-SUROWKA v. POLAND
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 33017/03
- EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 33017/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 33017/03
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, and Humen v. Poland [GC], no 26614/95, § 60, 15 October 1999).The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, and Humen v. Poland [GC], no 26614/95, § 60, 15 October 1999).
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 33017/03
The Court reiterates that, in the context of Article 13 and remedies for excessive length of proceedings, it has already held that such a remedy, or the aggregate of remedies, in order to be "effective" must be capable either of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a "hearing within a reasonable time" or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for a violation that had already occurred (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland, [GC], no. 30210/96, § 158 et seq. ECHR 2000-X). - EGMR, 25.05.2004 - 74073/01
DOMANSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 33017/03
Nevertheless, in the present case the applicant's cassation appeal lay dormant in the Regional Administrative Court for 20 months, which constitutes an unreasonable delay (see Domanska v. Poland, no 74073/01, § 32, 25 May 2004; a contrario Kepa v. Poland (dec.), no 49978/98, ECHR 30 September 2003). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 33017/03
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings are set out in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland (no 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V) and Ratajczyk v. Poland (no 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII).