Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MENGI v. TURKEY

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Mengi v. Turkey

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 38432/97

  THOMA v. LUXEMBOURG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 13471/05

  Finally, the Court reiterates that, although it cannot be said that civil servants knowingly lay themselves open to close scrutiny of their every word and deed to the extent politicians do, civil servants acting in an official capacity are, like politicians, subject to wider limits of acceptable criticism than private individuals (see Dyundin v. Russia, no. 37406/03, § 26, 14 October 2008 and Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 47, ECHR 2001-III and the references cited therein) and they must display a greater degree of tolerance, especially when they themselves makes public statements that are susceptible of criticism (see, for example, Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 2), 1 July 1997, § 59, Reports 1997-IV).
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 37406/03

  DYUNDIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 13471/05

  Finally, the Court reiterates that, although it cannot be said that civil servants knowingly lay themselves open to close scrutiny of their every word and deed to the extent politicians do, civil servants acting in an official capacity are, like politicians, subject to wider limits of acceptable criticism than private individuals (see Dyundin v. Russia, no. 37406/03, § 26, 14 October 2008 and Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 47, ECHR 2001-III and the references cited therein) and they must display a greater degree of tolerance, especially when they themselves makes public statements that are susceptible of criticism (see, for example, Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 2), 1 July 1997, § 59, Reports 1997-IV).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 13471/05

  In cases such as the present one the national margin of appreciation is circumscribed by the interest of democratic society in enabling the press to exercise its vital role of "public watchdog" in imparting information of serious public concern (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, §§ 59 and 62, ECHR 1999-III).

• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 346/04

  MUSTAFA ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  13471/05 and 38787/07, § 48, 27 November 2012).
• EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 40877/07

  HASAN YAZICI c. TURQUIE

  13471/05, and 38787/07, § 48, 27 November 2012).
• EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 64184/11

  PARASKEVOPOULOS v. GREECE

  13471/05 and 38787/07, § 48, 27 November 2012).
• EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08

  AURELIAN OPREA v. ROMANIA

  13471/05, and 38787/07, § 48, 27 November 2012).