Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 35887/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55280) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JANIASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Janiashvili v. Georgia
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 35887/05
- EGMR, 27.04.2016 - 35887/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 35887/05
The Court reiterates in this regard that it is not bound by domestic fee scales and practice (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 206, ECHR 2004-II, and Patsuria, cited above, § 103). - EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00
KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 35887/05
It is important that the prison authority has been able to maintain a comprehensive medical record of the applicant's state of health, monitoring the treatment he underwent from the beginning of his detention until the present day (compare with, for example, Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 83, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 19.02.2009 - 18660/03
MALENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 35887/05
Indeed, the Government, by disclosing all the information necessary for the assessment of the quality of the disputed treatment, have discharged their part of the burden of proof and have properly assisted the Court in its task of determining the facts, whilst the applicant limited himself to wholly unsubstantiated assertions (compare with Goginashvili, § 72, and contrast with Malenko v. Ukraine, no. 18660/03, §§ 56-57, 19 February 2009).