Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DIRDIZOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Dirdizov v. Russia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (91) Neu Zitiert selbst (40)
- EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 15217/07
ALEKSANDR MAKAROV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
Even though he received a personal reply that his complaint was to be examined, the Court reiterates that, as a general rule, an application to an ombudsman cannot be regarded as an effective remedy as required by Article 35 of the Convention, because the ombudsman has no power to render a binding decision granting redress (see Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, § 84, 12 March 2009, with further references).The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many others, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, 8 February 2005; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, 7 April 2005; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Solovyev v. Russia, no. 2708/02, 24 May 2007; Ignatov v. Russia, no. 27193/02, 24 May 2007; Mishketkul and Others v. Russia, no. 36911/02, 24 May 2007; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Matyush v. Russia, no. 14850/03, 9 December 2008; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Avdeyev and Veryayev v. Russia, no. 2737/04, 9 July 2009; Lamazhyk v. Russia, no. 20571/04, 30 July 2009; Makarenko v. Russia, no. 5962/03, 22 December 2009; Gultyayeva v. Russia, no. 67413/01, 1 April 2010; Goroshchenya v. Russia, no. 38711/03, 22 April 2010; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; Sutyagin v. Russia, no. 30024/02, 3 May 2011; Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011; Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, 11 October 2011; and Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012).
- EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
However, even in the absence of these, where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for or diminishing his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 52, ECHR 2002-III, with further references). - EGMR, 08.02.2005 - 45100/98
PANCHENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many others, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, 8 February 2005; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, 7 April 2005; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Solovyev v. Russia, no. 2708/02, 24 May 2007; Ignatov v. Russia, no. 27193/02, 24 May 2007; Mishketkul and Others v. Russia, no. 36911/02, 24 May 2007; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Matyush v. Russia, no. 14850/03, 9 December 2008; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Avdeyev and Veryayev v. Russia, no. 2737/04, 9 July 2009; Lamazhyk v. Russia, no. 20571/04, 30 July 2009; Makarenko v. Russia, no. 5962/03, 22 December 2009; Gultyayeva v. Russia, no. 67413/01, 1 April 2010; Goroshchenya v. Russia, no. 38711/03, 22 April 2010; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; Sutyagin v. Russia, no. 30024/02, 3 May 2011; Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011; Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, 11 October 2011; and Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012).
- EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 54071/00
ROKHLINA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many others, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, 8 February 2005; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, 7 April 2005; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Solovyev v. Russia, no. 2708/02, 24 May 2007; Ignatov v. Russia, no. 27193/02, 24 May 2007; Mishketkul and Others v. Russia, no. 36911/02, 24 May 2007; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Matyush v. Russia, no. 14850/03, 9 December 2008; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Avdeyev and Veryayev v. Russia, no. 2737/04, 9 July 2009; Lamazhyk v. Russia, no. 20571/04, 30 July 2009; Makarenko v. Russia, no. 5962/03, 22 December 2009; Gultyayeva v. Russia, no. 67413/01, 1 April 2010; Goroshchenya v. Russia, no. 38711/03, 22 April 2010; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; Sutyagin v. Russia, no. 30024/02, 3 May 2011; Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011; Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, 11 October 2011; and Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012). - EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many others, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, 8 February 2005; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, 7 April 2005; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Solovyev v. Russia, no. 2708/02, 24 May 2007; Ignatov v. Russia, no. 27193/02, 24 May 2007; Mishketkul and Others v. Russia, no. 36911/02, 24 May 2007; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Matyush v. Russia, no. 14850/03, 9 December 2008; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Avdeyev and Veryayev v. Russia, no. 2737/04, 9 July 2009; Lamazhyk v. Russia, no. 20571/04, 30 July 2009; Makarenko v. Russia, no. 5962/03, 22 December 2009; Gultyayeva v. Russia, no. 67413/01, 1 April 2010; Goroshchenya v. Russia, no. 38711/03, 22 April 2010; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; Sutyagin v. Russia, no. 30024/02, 3 May 2011; Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011; Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, 11 October 2011; and Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012). - EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05
MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many others, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, 8 February 2005; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, 7 April 2005; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Solovyev v. Russia, no. 2708/02, 24 May 2007; Ignatov v. Russia, no. 27193/02, 24 May 2007; Mishketkul and Others v. Russia, no. 36911/02, 24 May 2007; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Matyush v. Russia, no. 14850/03, 9 December 2008; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Avdeyev and Veryayev v. Russia, no. 2737/04, 9 July 2009; Lamazhyk v. Russia, no. 20571/04, 30 July 2009; Makarenko v. Russia, no. 5962/03, 22 December 2009; Gultyayeva v. Russia, no. 67413/01, 1 April 2010; Goroshchenya v. Russia, no. 38711/03, 22 April 2010; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; Sutyagin v. Russia, no. 30024/02, 3 May 2011; Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011; Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, 11 October 2011; and Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012). - EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure of deprivation of liberty do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla, cited above, §§ 92-94, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 208, 13 July 2006). - EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00
KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
The Court reiterates in this regard that even though Article 3 does not entitle a detainee to be released "on compassionate grounds", it has always interpreted the requirement to secure the health and well-being of detainees, among other things, as an obligation on the part of the State to provide detainees with the requisite medical assistance (see Kudla, cited above, § 94; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI; and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 96, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 2708/02
VLADIMIR SOLOVYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many others, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, 8 February 2005; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, 7 April 2005; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Solovyev v. Russia, no. 2708/02, 24 May 2007; Ignatov v. Russia, no. 27193/02, 24 May 2007; Mishketkul and Others v. Russia, no. 36911/02, 24 May 2007; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Matyush v. Russia, no. 14850/03, 9 December 2008; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Avdeyev and Veryayev v. Russia, no. 2737/04, 9 July 2009; Lamazhyk v. Russia, no. 20571/04, 30 July 2009; Makarenko v. Russia, no. 5962/03, 22 December 2009; Gultyayeva v. Russia, no. 67413/01, 1 April 2010; Goroshchenya v. Russia, no. 38711/03, 22 April 2010; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; Sutyagin v. Russia, no. 30024/02, 3 May 2011; Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011; Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, 11 October 2011; and Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012). - EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 27193/02
IGNATOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many others, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, 8 February 2005; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, 7 April 2005; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Solovyev v. Russia, no. 2708/02, 24 May 2007; Ignatov v. Russia, no. 27193/02, 24 May 2007; Mishketkul and Others v. Russia, no. 36911/02, 24 May 2007; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Matyush v. Russia, no. 14850/03, 9 December 2008; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Avdeyev and Veryayev v. Russia, no. 2737/04, 9 July 2009; Lamazhyk v. Russia, no. 20571/04, 30 July 2009; Makarenko v. Russia, no. 5962/03, 22 December 2009; Gultyayeva v. Russia, no. 67413/01, 1 April 2010; Goroshchenya v. Russia, no. 38711/03, 22 April 2010; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; Sutyagin v. Russia, no. 30024/02, 3 May 2011; Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011; Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, 11 October 2011; and Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012). - EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 28957/02
PSHEVECHERSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 36911/02
MISHKETKUL AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 65734/01
SHUKHARDIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.07.2008 - 22053/02
BELOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 14850/03
MATYUSH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 2737/04
AVDEYEV AND VERYAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 20571/04
LAMAZHYK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 5962/03
MAKARENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 67413/01
GULTYAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 38711/03
GOROSHCHENYA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 44511/04
LOGVINENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 30024/02
SUTYAGIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 5829/04
Russland wegen Chodorkowski verurteilt
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23215/02
ROMANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 57541/09
VALERIY SAMOYLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 106/02
BENEDIKTOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 2052/08
KOKOSHKINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 20075/03
SHILBERGS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 30251/03
ROMAN KARASEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 7842/04
VERBINT v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9697/82
JOHNSTON AND OTHERS v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
- EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
- EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 24559/94
GIBAS c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76
VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 12166/19
ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-11, 27 November 2012, as regards unreasonably long detention on remand; Idalov, cited above, §§ 154-58, as regards lengthy review of detention matters; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 36904/19
BUTYANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 53209/17
RADOSHEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 26285/19
DZUNDZA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 101-11, 27 November 2012, concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 45302/19
BURTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-11, 27 November 2012, as regards the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Govorushko v. Russia, no. 42940/06, 25 October 2007, and Korshunov v. Russia, no. 38971/06, 25 October 2007, concerning the lack of an enforceable right to compensation for detention which has been found to be in violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention; and Yevdokimov and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 41539/18
GALEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 101-11, 27 November 2012, concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, 13 February 2018, Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018, Chaldayev v. Russia, no. 33172/16, 28 May 2019, Pshibiyev and Berov v. Russia, no. 63748/13, 9 June 2020, and Mukhametov and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 31280/21
KHARLAMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, related to inadequate conditions of transport; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 101-11, 27 November 2012, as regards lengthy and unjustified pre-trial detention; and Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 35012/19
LUKASHCHUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. - EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 5136/19
LEBED AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect, Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 101-11, 27 November 2012, concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Idalov, cited above, §§ 154-58, concerning lengthy review of detention; and Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, §§ 35-57, 13 February 2018, concerning restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities). - EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 52342/20
LAVROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards placement in a metal cage during court hearings; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 101-11, 27 November 2012, concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 22 May 2012, related to lengthy review of detention; Boris Popov v. Russia, no. 23284/04, §§ 78-87, 28 October 2010, concerning lack of, or inadequate, compensation in respect of unlawful detention; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, concerning absence of a prosecuting party from the administrative proceedings, and Tsvetkova and Others, cited above, §§ 179-91, and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, regarding the lack of a suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of an administrative detention. - EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 20948/13
MEZAK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 17564/06
SADRETDINOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 13567/13
BURKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 10881/21
SOLDATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 2954/18
MAZANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 23169/18
VARACHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 13079/17
PROKAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 56247/15
KASHUBA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.10.2023 - 51678/15
PETERMAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 3345/18
OVCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 44437/21
GRISHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 14228/18
PANIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 19753/18
ZUBAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 15304/19
YELISEYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 38521/16
KLYACHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 45767/09
UTVENKO ET BORISOV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 27297/07
KOLOMENSKIY c. RUSSIE
- EGMR - 17472/18 (anhängig)
ARSHINOV v. RUSSIA and 20 other applications
- EGMR - 74141/10 (anhängig)
IZMESTYEV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 50956/15
LEPESHKINA AND SHILOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 5214/18 (anhängig)
SULEYMANOV v. RUSSIA and 23 other applications
- EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 14878/19
PAVLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 36533/18
KUVSHINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 24847/20
BOYKO-VELIKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 65143/19
TRENCHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 15009/19
BAZHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 47274/18
YEROKHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 39280/19
KUVSHINCHIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17
IVANTSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 35205/19
KHALIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 61744/11
N.G. c. RUSSIE
- EGMR - 51551/18 (anhängig)
FATTAKHOV v. RUSSIA and 15 other applications
- EGMR - 78918/17 (anhängig)
KAZNACHEYEV v. RUSSIA and 10 other applications
- EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 24453/17
YELISTRATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 52727/19
SHMONIN AND YEFREMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 61350/19
AKHMETZYANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 10711/15
BOCHAROVA AND ENFIADZHYAN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 39439/20
BONDAREV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 17010/18
SUNGATOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 31282/18
VARSHAVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 41248/17
BORISOVSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 50711/19
DILMUKHAMETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.04.2022 - 33126/08
KLIMIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 35249/19
VAVILIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 47537/11
SKOROBOGATOVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
PISKUNOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 41090/05
SERGEYEV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 54994/18
KOZHUKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 27425/19
GULAMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 6510/21
TIMOKHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 48884/19
KATASONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 75115/17
ZHAMBULOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 30472/18
TOKARENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 50703/19
BELONOSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 61059/19
SERKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 29696/19
RERIKH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 39881/19
VOLKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.05.2022 - 17730/08
POPOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.04.2022 - 1797/20
SHAFOROST v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 14813/10
OSECHKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.05.2021 - 77635/11
TSEPELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.11.2019 - 30709/10
MAZITOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.10.2017 - 51497/08
NAUMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 66231/14
DMITRIYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 29998/04
PRIGARIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.09.2015 - 13008/13
KOVYAZIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 52025/13
MUMRYAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 49038/12
GUSEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 45580/15
TREGUET c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 32992/13
SOVETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 79300/17
YERMAKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.06.2018 - 30155/05
VERESHCHAGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 39630/03
RUSAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 46144/12
TERENINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
ALEKSANDR NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 20285/21
PYZH AND DOBROVOLSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 9956/20
KUPRIYANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 29894/17
ALEKSANDR BIKBULATOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 59297/09
POLOMKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 50992/16
KULMINSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06
CHIRYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA